|
skipped
Famiglia e matrimonio: tradizione e innovazione
Sono in atto nella società moderna, da diversi decenni ormai, processi di
cambiamento nell'area dell'organizzazione dell'aggruppamento umano.
Il fatto di consociarsi, è per l'essere umano, un comportamento al servizio
di istinti, pulsioni e bisogni. L'associazione specializzata fra umani, è ciò
che noi chiamiamo "famiglia".
Nella cultura occidentale ad impronta cattolica, la denominazione di famiglia
si riferisce automaticamente soltanto all'unione fra un uomo e una donna e i loro figli,
più i parenti più stretti.
Tuttavia la famiglia, nel suo significato fondamentale, è una
qualunque associazione fra umani, fondata su sentimenti ed intenzioni di aiuto
reciproco, solidale, amorevole e strutturata nel rispetto di un progetto
condiviso. Questa tipologia di associazione umana soddisfa alcuni dei bisogni
fondamentali dell'essere umano ed esorcizza alcune paure fondamentali. Tuttavia
soltanto l'associazione fra sessi diversi può soddisfare anche l'istinto
sessuale con modalità ordinate e l'istinto ed il bisogno di procreazione. Di
conseguenza una famiglia esaustiva, cioè completa per soddisfare tutti questi
istinti e bisogni, non può che essere a composizione eterosessuale. Nel tempo la
struttura di questa associazione eterosessuale, specialmente in seno alla
cultura cattolica, ha finito per assumere, nel mondo occidentale cattolico,
quasi esclusivamente la forma monogama.
Nonostante ciò gli esseri umani non hanno mai smesso di
teorizzare e tentare di praticare strutture e forme di associazione diverse da
quelle più tradizionali, restando la famiglia una necessità inderogabile
richiesta dalla Natura Umana, prima ancora che da qualsiasi teoria e cultura.
|
The Netherlands and Belgium were the first
countries to give full marriage rights to
homosexuals. In the United States some
politicians propose “civil unions” that give
homosexual couples the full benefits and
responsibilities of marriage. These civil unions
differ from marriage only in name.
Meanwhile in the Netherlands polygamy has
been
legalised in all but name. Last Friday the
first civil
union of three partners was registered.
Victor de Bruijn (46) from Roosendaal “married”
both Bianca (31) and Mirjam (35) in a ceremony
before a notary who duly registered their civil
union.
“I love both Bianca and Mirjam, so I am
marrying them both,” Victor said. He had
previously been married to Bianca. Two and a
half years ago they met Mirjam Geven through an
internet chatbox. Eight weeks later Mirjam
deserted her husband and came to live with
Victor and Bianca. After Mirjam’s divorce the
threesome decided to marry.
Victor: “A marriage between three persons is
not possible in the Netherlands, but a civil
union is. We went to the notary in our marriage
costume and exchanged rings. We consider this to
be just an ordinary marriage.”
Asked by journalists to tell the secret of
their peculiar relationship, Victor explained
that there is no jealousy between them. “But
this is because Mirjam and Bianca are bisexual.
I think that with two heterosexual women it
would be more difficult.” Victor stressed,
however, that he is “a one hundred per cent
heterosexual” and that a fourth person will not
be allowed into the “marriage.” They want to
take their marriage obligations seriously: “to
be honest and open with each other and not
philander.”
Update:
Dutch Minister Not to Prevent Polygamy 1
November 2005
The War against Marriage and Men 19 December
2005
§
|
Da Wikipedia,
l'enciclopedia libera.
Link:
Associazione Mondiale Poliamore

Il termine poliamore è
un
neologismo che esprime il
concetto di «amori multipli».
L'ideale di una relazione
poliamorosa è quella di
avere una relazione sentimentale
e/o sessuale onesta con più
partner nello stesso periodo.
Il termine è stato coniato
indipendentemente da più
persone, tra cui
Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart
che introdusse il termine
«relazione poliamorosa» nel suo
articolo
A Bouquet of Lovers nel
1990, e
Jennifer Wesp che creò su
Usenet il newsgroup
alt.polyamory nel
1992. Tuttavia occorrenze
del termine sono state reperite
già a partire dagli
anni sessanta, e le
relazioni poliamorose sono
ovviamente esistite da ben prima
che il termine venisse creato.
L'inizio della
manifestazione in
favore del poliamore
svoltasi a
San Francisco
nel
2004

Tipologie
di poliamore
Le tipologie di relazioni
poliamorose comprendono:
- La
polifedeltà, in cui
le relazioni sentimentali e
sessuali sono ristrette ad
un particolare gruppo di
partners.
- Le
relazioni secondarie,
in cui sono presenti tipi di
relazioni diverse, quelle
primarie e quelle secondarie
appunto. Esempi sono il
matrimonio aperto e la
coppia aperta.
- La
poligamia (ovvero
poliginia,
poliandria e loro
combinazioni), in cui una
persona sposa più coniugi
(che possono eventualmente
avere a loro volta altre
relazioni poliamorose)
- La
relazione di gruppo o il
matrimonio di gruppo, in
cui tutti i membri di un
gruppo si considerano
ugualmente legati gli uni
agli altri. Il concetto è
illustrato da
Robert A. Heinlein nel
romanzo
Straniero in terra straniera
(Stranger in a Strange
Land), e da
Robert Rimmer.
- Reti di relazioni in cui
una particolare persona può
avere relazioni di vari
gradi di importanza con
diverse persone, tutte
d'accordo sull'«amicizia
senza frontiere».
- Relazioni in cui un
partner è
monogamo ma accetta che
l'altro abbia altre
relazioni.
Alcune persone, pur
intrattenendo una relazione
sessuale strettamente monogama,
possono autodefinirsi
poliamorose qualora si sentano
emotivamente legate a più
persone (amore
platonico).

Riconoscimenti
legali delle relazioni
poliamorose
Pochi paesi consentono
matrimoni di stato tra tre o
più partner. Tra i paesi che
fanno eccezione c'è l'Olanda,
che permette
unioni civili tra più
persone, e che ha celabrato la
prima unione nazionale fra tre
partner nel
settembre
2005.
[1]
I
valori del poliamore
Diversamente dal caso
generale dello
scambismo, le relazioni
poliamorose includono un legame
sentimentale; tuttavia il
dibattito su quali siano le
distinzioni tra lo scambismo e
il poliamore è ancora aperto.
Onestà
e rispetto
La maggior parte dei
monogami definisce la
fedeltà come l'impegno di
esclusività sessuale verso un
unico partner (alla volta).
Invece, la maggior parte dei
poliamorosi definisce la fedeltà
come l'onestà e l'apertura verso
i propri partner, ed il
mantenere gli impegni presi con
essi.
La maggior parte dei
poliamorosi pone l'accento sul
rispetto verso tutti i partner.
L'evitare di dare certe
informazioni, anche in base ad
un accordo del tipo "niente
domande, niente racconti", è
solitamente mal visto, poiché
indica che i partner non si
sentono in grado di gestire la
verità; i partner del proprio
partner dovrebbero infatti
essere accettati e non
solamente tollerati.

Il
poliamore e l'essere genitori
Come per gli altri aspetti
del poliamore, le possibilità
sul modo in cui i figli vengono
integrati all'interno della
struttura
familiare varia
considerevolmente:
- I genitori sono i
principali responsabili dei
propri figli (biologici,
adottivi o
figliastri), ma le
persone che hanno una
relazione poliamorosa coi
genitori contribuiscono a
crescerli, agendo come una
famiglia estesa.
- Nei casi in cui le
relazioni poliamorose sono
ristrette all'interno di un
gruppo, tutti i membri
adulti del gruppo si
occupano della crescita dei
figli in modo collettivo,
tutti con pari
responsabilità a prescindere
dai legami di
consanguineità.
- Una forma intermedia
rispetto alle due precedenti
prevede che i figli vedano i
partner dei loro genitori
come genitori adottivi.
- La responsabilità della
crescita dei figli ricade
interamente sui genitori,
mentre le persone con cui
essi sono in relazioni
poliamorose sono visti dai
figli solo come amici dei
loro genitori.
Nella scelta tra queste forme
di relazione la durata del
rapporto coi genitori gioca un
ruolo fondamentale; infatti un
adulto che sia stato partner del
genitore per tutta la vita del
figlio avrà con esso un "legame
genitoriale" più forte rispetto
ad un nuovo partner. Questo
aspetto è presente anche nei
casi di genitori adottivi in
famiglie monogame.
Altri fattori che possono avere
un'influenza significativa nel
legame tra i propri figli e i
propri partner sono l'eventuale
convivenza, il numero delle
relazioni, e la consapevolezza
che i figli hanno della
tipologia delle relazioni dei
loro genitori.



§
|
Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, Volume 6,
Feb. 27, 2003
www.ejhs.org
Polyamory - What it is and what it isn't.
by
Derek McCullough
and
David S. Hall, Ph.D.
   
"Do not go where the path
may lead, go instead where there is no path and
leave a trail"
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Polyamory - What it is..
"Your love is located
within you. It is yours to nurture and savor, to
give to others in any way you choose. Love must
be without qualifications or demands. You must
learn to find ecstasy in other peoples happiness.
Once you feel love for yourself, it is quite
normal to give it away." Wayne Dyer Gifts
from Eykis
Polyamory has been defined as
the philosophy and practice of loving more than
one person at a time with honesty and integrity.
Synonyms for polyamory are responsible, ethical,
and intentional, non-monogamy. Because those
descriptions are somewhat clumsy, the term
Polyamory was coined in the late 80's by a pagan
Priestess, Morning Glory Zell, and defines a
range of different lifestyle alternatives. In
most cases, but not all, this involves some
sexual or at least intensely intimate sensual
behavior.
There have been various
polyamorous communities and communes, perhaps
the most famous being the Onieda Community in
New York State in the mid-1800's, but generally
they are isolated and keep their heads down,
given the prevailing moral climate.
What do Polyamorists, in
general, say they believe?
Polyamorists say that their
philosophy is nothing more than a
straightforward acceptance and celebration of
the realities of human nature.
Polyamorists say that sex is
not the enemy, that the real enemy is the deceit
and betrayal of trust that results from trying
to shoehorn our natural selves into a rigid,
unnatural social system.
Polyamorists say that sex is
a positive force if applied with honesty,
responsibility and trust.
Polyamorists do not have to
individually meet every need of each partner;
they have help. If your wife loves opera and you
dislike it, maybe one of her lovers will enjoy
taking her to hear it. If he is also a computer
whiz, and helps fix your computers when they
don't behave, you are a very lucky person.
Polyamorists say that love is
an infinite, not a finite commodity. An example
of this is with children. When my oldest
daughter was born, I loved her with every ounce
of my being. When my son was born, I found that
I didn't have to give them half a love each, I
could love them both fully. My third child is
loved as much, if not more, than the other two.
This also applies to friends
- when you meet someone new, you don't have to
think about who you are going to drop off to
make them fit. As a woman said when explaining
why she chose polyamory - "I refuse to accept
the myth that I have to stop loving one person
before I start loving another."
Polyamorists say that loving
someone does not give you the right to control
that person's behavior.
Polyamorists say that
jealousy is not innate, inevitable and
impossible to overcome. But they deal with
jealousy often, usually successfully. There is a
new term for the opposite of jealousy.
"Compersion" is the feeling of joy that comes
from knowing that the one you love is well loved
by someone else.
Polyamorists say that love
should be unconditional, rather than the
monogamous proposition that "I will love you on
the condition that you will not love anyone
else" - "forsaking all others" is how it usually
is put. And as shown by history, monogamy and
marriage are no safeguards against falling in
love with someone else.
Polyamorists believe in long
term emotional investment in relationships, and
while the goal is not always achieved in poly,
it is also not always achieved in monogamy.
Polyamorists believe they
represent true "family values". They have the
courage to live an alternative lifestyle that,
while condemned by society, is satisfying and
rewarding. Children having multiple parents are
more likely to be better cared for, and less
likely to feel abandoned if someone leaves the
family.
The Contrast with Monogamy
One of the nearly universally
accepted assumptions in our society is the
assumption that the monogamous pair is the only
valid structure of human sexual relationships,
being so superior that it doesn't warrant
scrutiny. In fact, our culture puts so much
emphasis on it, through cultural norms, modern
literature and films, that serious discussion on
the subject of alternatives is rare. Monogamous
marriage has even been incorporated into the law
of our land in the section that specifies how
money for sex education must be spent. It is a
focus of the religious right when they talk
about how to reduce welfare, how to reduce
abortion, how to reduce single parent families,
and many other issues.
The reasons given for
monogamous marriage being the only acceptable
form of couple relating, and the only place
where sex is allowed, generally fall into two
categories.
1. It is our natural state
(i.e., hard-wired)
2. It is the only moral
state, the one approved by God - all other
options are inherently sinful.
It is interesting to note
that these are essentially the same reasons
given by the fundamentalist right for their
condemnation of homosexuality, namely that it is
unnatural and immoral, and explains the affinity
of polyamorists to the GLBT community. There is
an excellent Beacon Press book by E. J. Graff, "What
is Marriage For". Graff's six reasons
for marriage are: money, sex, babies, kin, order
and heart. She provides an excellent historical
review of marriage and convincing evidence that
our view of marriage is a very culturally
determined one, and not a "natural" condition of
the human organism.
If intelligent life is about
the free and responsible search for truth and
meaning then it is apparent that unquestioned
answers are more dangerous than unanswered
questions. Therefore, questioning monogamous
marriage might be thought of as obligatory. Are
we hard wired for it? Is it the only "moral" way
of relating sexually to others?
It's only Natural.
"The complexity of a
system is limited only if the system is rigid,
inflexible and isolated from its environment.
Self-organizing systems in continual interaction
with their environment are capable of
tremendously increasing their complexity by
abandoning structural stability in favor of
flexibility and open ended evolution."
Erich Jantsch. Design for
Living.
In examining the natural
structure of things, the binary system doesn't
really stand out. The atomic structure has three
parts; proton, electron, and neutron. These then
combine to produce a complex array of atoms and
thence molecules. Architectural structures
generally, from the pyramids through to the
geodesic domes of Buckminster Fuller, are based
on the triangle. In music, a three-note chord is
more dynamic and powerful than one made up of
two notes. I know these are not persuasive
arguments, but the triad is also a very common
poly arrangement.
The increasing evidence from
animal research is that fewer and fewer species
(once thought to be so) are really monogamous in
the wild. In the animal kingdom, less than 5% of
all animals are now thought to be monogamous.
The evolutionary biologists
posit that there are many good reasons for
nonmonogamy, but their theories are difficult,
if not impossible, to test. The anthropology
argument for monogamy, that a man would only
protect his children if he was sure of their
paternity, is being questioned, most recently in
a book called "Cultures of Multiple
Fathers". In this study, the authors
found evidence that showed that the children of
women who had sexual relationships with many men
had better survival rates - because of "potential"
paternity, they were less vulnerable.
Of the 1270 human societies
catalogued in Murdoch's Ethnographic Atlas,
about 85% indicate some form of multi-spouse
relationships. Even the few societies that
theoretically espouse monogamy, like ours, have
trouble showing any evidence that it works. On
the contrary, there seems to be a lot of
evidence that Western humans don't do monogamy
well in the high divorce rates, high rates of
infidelity, the highest teen pregnancy rate in
the western world, high single parent family
numbers, and other indicators. We often see
people leave an otherwise good marriage because
they fell in love with someone new, in what
might be called serial monogamy. In short, the
argument that the human animal is "hard wired"
for monogamy is difficult to support.
In any case, since we humans
are so bad at monogamy, other freely chosen
relationship structures should also be
supported.
It is sinful - God doesn't
like it.
"Wickedness is a myth
invented by good people to account for the
curious attractiveness of others." Oscar Wilde
Chameleon.
"Confusing monogamy with
morality has done more to destroy the conscience
of the human race than any other error."
George Bernard Shaw
The sinfulness and wickedness
of sex is based on the assumption that God
doesn't like sex. This poison has its roots in
Ancient Assyria, and the religions of Mythra and
Zoroastrianism, which first put forth the idea
of "the obscenity of the flesh." The sex drive,
being one that cannot be denied, becomes a rich
source of implanted guilt and shame, used to
manipulate and degrade the individual. Therefore
any sexual (natural) feelings need to be
accompanied by shame, and therefore kept secret.
Somehow this shameful, sinful
act is transformed into sacred overnight if
accompanied by the right words by someone with
the appropriate qualifications to marry people.
It does not seem to matter how the marriage was
arranged, for what reasons the people are
marrying, or even if they want to be married.
The only requirement is that they go through the
legal process.
Without going into it too
deeply, a perusal of most mainstream religions
show that
1. Many of the ancient texts
were written by polygamists, and
2. Most of the rules were
based on considering women as property, rather
than as a result of a solemn promise between
equals.
It is also worth noting that
no matter how strict the moral teachings, or how
severe the punishments, be it from the Taliban,
the Bible belt, Rome or Washington, human beings
persist in trying to satisfy their sexual
desires. A recent news article reported that 40%
of nuns had a history of being sexually abused,
either before or within the Roman church. The
data on priests is slowly becoming public. The
data on the general public is harder to obtain,
given the resistance to admit to being abused,
or being an abuser. It is clear that sex crimes
put a lot of people in jail.
There is historical evidence
of religions that embrace our sexual nature in a
positive way, found on temple carvings from
Asia, pottery from Europe and elsewhere, but it
is not a feature of current Western mainstream
religious practice.
Serial monogamy is perhaps an
unconscious compromise between the cultural
ideal of monogamy and the facts of human nature
- in other words, we acknowledge that you can
love more than one person, but only one at a
time. The destructive effects of serial monogamy
on children are well documented, with 8 million
single parent families in the US,
infidelity-fueled acrimonious divorces, through
to the spate of spouse murdering lately. Much of
the evidence seems to indicate that human
attainment of the cultural ideal of monogamy is
a myth.
The moral argument for
monogamy is a weak position. A better moral
argument can be made regarding what is best for
each individual and for society, that is, do we
make life better for each and all by insisting
on sex only in monogamous marriage of
heterosexual couples, or on letting individuals
find responsible ways of relating that, in Pagan
terms, "harm none". Liberal religion has taken a
fine stance supporting homosexual and
heterosexual couples, and unmarried couples as
well. What is so hard about seeing the parallels
to the "more than a couple" part?
It is a reality that there
are many people now relating sexually in groups
greater than two. The reason I keep referring to
"relating sexually" is that this seems to be the
stumbling block for many. If polyamorists were
to keep it platonic, not be sexually involved
with people they love in numbers greater than
one, most would applaud their loving behavior.
But when they admit that they not only love more
than one, but have sexual relationships with
more than one, all the red flags come flying
out.
If you watch TV at all, you
will know that polyamory is getting a lot of
play, from episodes on Ally McBeal, talk shows
like Montel Williams, John Walsh, Geraldo, and
HBO's Real Sex. There are many poly friendly
films available from Hollywood, and of course
the Really Rich and Famous can do what they
please about relationships and get lots of
favorable press. What has brought polys out of
the closet is the Internet, where people who
thought they were the "only ones" find lots of
company.
Polyamory - What it
isn't..
"Current sexual practice
can no longer be explained by the old theories
and we do not yet understand it in the light of
new ones. Racing ahead of history, we now find
ourselves in a new territory." June Singer
The Energies of Love.
Polyamory as it is defined is
frequently misunderstood. Polyamory is not "The
Answer". If you are looking for a quick fix for
relationship problems, don't look to polyamory.
It is a choice, as is monogamy, that needs to be
taken responsibly, and brings with it as many,
if not more, challenges. It is definitely not a
fix for a bad marriage or other relationship
problems.
The most widespread
misunderstanding is with swinging. Swinging is
essentially recreational sex, also known as wife
swapping ( though curiously not husband
swapping). Research has shown that swingers are
largely indistinguishable from the rest of the
population except that they are people who would
rather have sex than play bridge on Saturday
night.
Swinging does share a lot in
common with polyamory in that it is
nonmonogamous, intentional and responsible. Both
lifestyles share the idea that sex is a
positive, pleasurable and natural part of being
human, and not a synonym for love. The main
difference is that swinging focuses on casual
sex and tends to prohibit other intimacy,
whereas polyamory is more concerned with
enduring intimate relationships that include
sex. There is however some crossover, with
people arriving at one via the other and vice
versa. Unfortunately, in our society obsessed
with promoting the cultural myth of monogamy,
the salacious aspects of swinging are often used
to reputationally smear both swingers and
polyamorists. Examples include the Wyoming
politician who withdrew his candidacy in the
2002 election when his lifestyle was exposed,
the attempt in 2002 to disqualify Jack McGeorge
as a UN weapons inspector in Iraq because he
teaches S&M and espouses sexual freedom, and the
effort to blame the parents in the 2001 child
killing in San Diego because they were swingers.
Many polys wished Bill Clinton had said he loved
Hillary and Monica, and that Hillary was
supportive of that relationship, but it looked
more like cheating than loving.
Swinging and polyamory are
not "free love" in the 60's sense of the term.
(This seems to be one of the objections of those
who survived, or were wounded, in the sixties.)
In a lot of cases, free love in the 60's was a
response to the enormous freeing up of taboos
against sex that occurred at that time, and
often was not accompanied by honesty or
responsibility, but used as an excuse to have a
lot of sex. It was frequently grouped together
with drugs, (as in the mantra of "sex, drugs and
rock-n-roll") which allowed it to be discounted
as "a phase," facilitating a return to the
"traditional" values that were reestablished in
the 80's and 90's.
The challenges besetting the
putative polyamorist are:
Sex.
"If W.H.Auden is correct
when he observes that 'As a rule it was only the
pleasure haters who became unjust', then only a
civilization that fosters erotic celebration can
usher in a new era of justice-making" Matthew
Fox Original Blessing.
This is the bit that trips
most people up. When you cite the example of
infinite love regarding children, people can
understand the concept, but somehow sexual love
between consenting adults is seen as different.
We confuse sex and love too easily, often
employing sex to do the work of love and love to
do the work of sex. For a long time adultery was
the only grounds for divorce, yet in reality, it
was the deceit and betrayal that were the
problems, not the sex itself.
As the Chinese proverb says
"The beginning of wisdom is to call things by
their proper name." Understanding the difference
between sex, love and intimacy will go a long
way to solving relationship problems.
The more we study sex, which
has only been done scientifically in the last
century, the more we realize how complex,
variable and universal it is. As pointed out
earlier, enjoyment of sex was considered evil,
particularly in women (witches). Then, after
Freud, it was often considered a sickness. For
many years, nymphomania was considered a disease
of women who liked sex. (See Groneman.)
To top it off, sex has become
politically incorrect, attacked from both the
left, the radical feminists who equate sex with
the degradation of women, and the right - well,
we should all know about their attacks on
comprehensive sex education and medically
correct sexual health information.
Either way, sex is seen as
sinful, sleazy and best kept private. And the
ACLU help us if we have any visual depictions of
sex. Of course, violence is entertaining for the
public, only sex is rated X.
We have become crippled by
our fear of sex, allowing it to become a trigger
for all kinds of hysteria. Think of the
knee-jerk reaction to the term "Internet porn".
Several recent books focus on this hysteria born
of sexual fear, including Lynley Hood's
outstanding book "A City Possessed" and Judith
Levine's "Harmful to Minors - The Perils of
Protecting Children from Sex", a volume that
provoked substantial hysteria of its own when
published recently. And yet, despite all the
dire warnings, we find that humans continue to
explore their sexuality in a rainbow of ways -
the sex drive will not be denied. Tom Robbins,
in "Fierce Invalids Home From Hot Climates",
cites erotic celebration, as opposed to mindless
procreation, as one of the six things that make
us different from the rest of the animal
kingdom.
So sex is not the enemy. When
accepted with honesty and responsibility, it
could well become part of the solution, as Fox
outlines in the quote above.
Jealousy.
"The only way out of
jealousy is through it. We may have to let
jealousy have its way with us and do its job of
reorienting fundamental values. Its pain comes,
at least in part, from opening up to unexplored
territory and letting go of old familiar truths
in the face of unknown and threatening
possibilities." Thomas Moore Care of the
Soul.
This is the other big myth -
that jealousy is innate, inevitable and
impossible to overcome. Indeed, showing jealousy
is even taken as proof of love, and is used a
valid excuse for violent and aggressive
behavior. Until recently, catching your wife in
bed with a lover was a defense for murder in
some places. Jealousy, possessiveness and
control are also at the core of domestic
violence, which thrives in the privacy of
monogamy.
Our culture seems addicted to
three core beliefs about relationships that are
almost guaranteed to create jealousy in even the
most well adjusted people. Identifying and
dismantling these beliefs is the most effective
way of dealing with jealousy.
Core belief #1
If my partner really loved
me, there would not be any desire for an
intimate or sexual relationship with anyone
else.
This is based on the scarcity
model of love, in which a partner's emotional or
love interest in somebody else means that I will
be loved less. It is as absurd as the idea that
to have a second child is an indication that you
don't love your first child enough. It also
presumes that sex and love are the same thing
and meet the same needs.
Core belief #2.
If I were a good
partner/spouse/lover, my partner would be so
satisfied that they wouldn't want to get
involved with anybody else.
This belief is even more
insidious. With the first belief you can at
least blame the problem on your partner. This
belief makes it your fault for not being the
perfect lover. This is also the basis of the
widespread romantic myth of the "one and only
person on the planet". This is also guaranteed
to cause serious self-esteem problems, which is
fertile ground for jealousy.
Core belief #3.
It is just not possible to
love more than one person at a time.
This again is based on the
scarcity theory of love, that I only have a
finite amount to give.
All of these beliefs are
connected to a primal fear of loss and
abandonment, however unfounded. Neale Donald
Walsche, in his series "Conversations with
God" described fear as "False Evidence
Appearing Real". I prefer "Fantasy Existing As
Reality", in other words, we imagine the worst
possible outcomes and then believe that these
are our "real" feelings.
Polyamorists replace these
core beliefs with three new core beliefs.
New Core Belief #1
My partner loves me and
trusts me so much that we can allow our
relationship to expand and be enriched by
experiencing even more love from others. There
is an abundance of love in the world and there
is plenty for everyone. Loving more than one
person is a choice that can exponentially expand
the potential for giving and receiving love.
New Core Belief #2.
My partner is so confident in
me and our relationship that having other
partners will not create jealousy that will
destroy our love.
New Core Belief #3
Whatever socially unusual
arrangements we have set up in our love lives,
they have been agreed to consciously and
responsibly by everyone involved. We insist on
integrity in our relationships.
Once you can get away from
the "either/or" polarity, and accept an
"and/both" approach, or as some Polys say,
having your Kate and Edith too, many of the
accompanying demons associated with jealousy
will disappear.
Practicalities.
"Eccentricity has always
abounded where and when strength of character
has abounded: and the amount of eccentricity in
a society has generally been proportional to the
amount of genius, mental vigor and moral courage
it contained. That so few dare to be eccentric
marks the chief danger of the time" John
Stuart Mill
We live in a culturally
monogamous society, so to espouse polyamory
certainly puts you in the eccentric category,
"the lunatic fringe" so to speak. In the current
political climate, this also brings with it
dangers. This is illustrated in cases where
children have been removed from their parents
because they were not living in the mandated
norm of mum, dad and the kids. To come out as
poly is a vulnerable thing to do, given all the
misunderstandings and all the sleazy, sinful
innuendo. It is also the reason why poly people
relate to the gay and lesbian community, who
have been through, and in many cases still are
going through, the same process. Polyamorists
are certainly viewed by the societal majority
with the utmost suspicion.
Polyamorists also fully
support the right of anyone to select monogamy
as a life choice, and believe it is the right
choice for many people. The key here is choice.
"It is dangerous to be
right in matters on which the established
authorities are wrong."
Voltaire
Given all the hassle, why
bother to be polyamorous? It is certainly not to
be able to have more sex. If that is what you
are after, you will probably have much more
success operating under the widely accepted
model of "It is OK if nobody knows." To be open
is to be too weird for most people.
But to realize that you are
polyamorous in a monogamous world can often mean
going through life with the sense that you are
harboring a dirty little secret. It can cause
isolation, alienation and an inability to be
intimate with people - you are hiding a core
part of yourself.
For Polyamorists, the rewards
are simple. One of the best gifts you can give
yourself is the permission to be yourself. By
loving yourself unconditionally, and respecting
all your qualities and inclinations, you allow
yourself to be at peace. This becomes part of a
larger process of self-differentiation - of
determining who you are and what is important to
you. To live as a poly requires the same value
base as living morally, ethically, honestly and
responsibly.
Questions for you to
answer.
"A free and responsible
search for truth and meaning" Unitarian
Universalist affirmation.
If my partners' happiness is
important to me, why should I get upset if
others can make them happy? What is more
important, my partners' happiness or who gets
the credit?
If I find my partner
attractive, sexy, and lovely and desirable, why
should I feel surprised and threatened when
someone else does? In fact, should it not give
us something more in common - a shared interest?
(In the same way that we like the teachers who
like our children.)
If monogamy is so natural and
hardwired, why is there such a large
relationship industry - the "How to make it
right" of magazines, books, TV shows, marriage
guidance, etc.?
Acknowledgement:
This started as a Sunday message
by Derek McCullough, a UU from NZ. It evolved
into a presentation to other UU folks, and
finally to this article. Thanks to the Journal
editors who carefully reviewed and edited this
work.
Revised 2/23/05
References:
http://www.uupa.org/
http://www.lovemore.com/
http://www.lovethatworks.org/
http://www.lovewithoutlimits.com/
http://www.worldpolyamoryassociation.org/index.html
Anapol, D. "Polyamory: The
new love without limits"
Available through Loving
More, POB 4358, Boulder, CO 80306
Beckerman, S. and Valentine,
P. (Eds.) "Cultures with Multiple Fathers" U.
Florida Press, 2002
Foster, B., Foster, M., and
Hadady, L. "Three in Love" Harper Collins, 1997
Francoeur, R., Cornog, M.,
and Pepper, T. (Eds.) "Sex, Love and Marriage in
the 21st Century: The next sexual
revolution" To Excell Press, 1999
Graff, E. J. "What is
Marriage For?" Beacon Press, 1999
Groneman, C. "Nymphomania"
W. W. Norton, 2000
Hood, L. "A City Possessed -
The Christchurch Civic Creche Case" Longacre
Press, 2001
Lano & Parry (Eds.) "Breaking
the Barriers to Desire: New approaches to
multiple relationships" Five Leaves
Publications, Nottingham, 1995
Levine, J. "Harmful to Minors
- The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex"
U. Minn. Press, 2002
Lizst, C. and Easton, D. "The
Ethical Slut: A guide to infinite sexual
possibilities" Greenery Press, 1997
"Loving More" magazine, a
quarterly publication for the polyamory
community.
Available through Loving
More, POB 4358, Boulder, CO 80306
Mazur, R. "The New Intimacy"
To Excell Press, 1973, 2000
Murdock, G. P. "Ethnographic
Atlas" World Culture, Vol. 2-4, 1986
Nearing, R. "The New Faithful:
A Polyfidelity Primer" Polyfidelity Educational
Productions
Available through Loving
More, POB 4358, Boulder, CO 80306
|
From Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia
- In botany, "polygamous"
means bearing both
hermaphrodite and unisexual
flowers on the same plant.
See
plant sexuality
The term polygamy (a
Greek word meaning "the
practice of multiple marriage")
is used in related ways in
social anthropology,
sociobiology, and
sociology. Polygamy can be
defined as any "form
of marriage in which a
person [has] more than one
spouse."[1]
In social anthropology,
polygamy is the practice of
marriage to more than one
spouse simultaneously.
Historically, polygamy has been
practiced as
polygyny (one man having
more than one wife), or as
polyandry (one woman
having more than one husband),
or, less commonly as
group marriage (husbands
having many wives and those
wives having many husbands). (See
"Forms of Polygamy" below.) In
contrast,
monogamy is the practice of
each person having only one
spouse. Like monogamy,
the term is often used in a
de facto sense, applying
regardless of whether the
relationships are recognized by
the
state (see
marriage for a discussion on
the extent to which states can
and do recognize potentially and
actually polygamous forms as
valid). In sociobiology,
polygamy is used in a broad
sense to mean any form of
multiple
mating. In a narrower sense,
used by
zoologists, polygamy
includes a pair bond, perhaps
temporary.
Forms
of polygamy
Polygamy exists in three
specific forms, including
polygyny (one man having
multiple wives),
polyandry (one woman
having multiple husbands), or
group marriage (some
combination of polygyny and
polyandry). Historically, all
three practices have been found,
but polygyny is by far the most
common.[2]
Confusion arises when the broad
term "polygamy" is used when a
narrower definition is intended.
Polygyny
Polygyny is the situation in
which one man is either married
to or involved in sexual
relationships with a number of
different women at one time.
This is the most common form of
polygamy. This was the most
common form of polygamy
practiced by
Mormons in the 19th century,
and practiced today by
self-identified
fundamentalist offshoots.
Polyandry
Polyandry is a practice
where a woman is married to more
than one man at the same time.
Fraternal polyandry was
traditionally practiced among
nomadic
Tibetans in
Nepal and parts of
China, in which two or more
brothers share the same wife,
with her having equal sexual
access to them. Polyandry is
believed to be more likely in
societies with scarce
environmental resources, as it
is believed to limit human
population growth and enhance
child survival. A woman can only
have so many children in her
lifetime, no matter how many
husbands she has. On the other
hand, a child with many "fathers",
all of whom provide resources,
is more likely to survive. (In
contrast, the number of children
would be increased if polygyny
were practiced, and a man had
more than one wife. These wives
could be simultaneously pregnant).[3]
It is a rare form of marriage
that exists not only among poor
families, but also within the
elite.[4]
Group
marriage
Group marriage, or circle
marriage, may exist in a
number of forms, such as where
more than one man and more than
one woman form a single
family unit, and all members
of the marriage share
parental responsibility for
any children arising from the
marriage. Another possible
arrangement not thought to exist
in reality (on the social level),
although occurring in
science fiction (notably in
Robert Heinlein'sThe
Moon Is a Harsh Mistress),
is the long-lived
line marriage, in which
deceased or departing spouses in
the group are continually
replaced by others, so that
family property never becomes
dispersed through inheritance.
Bigamy
Bigamy is the act or
condition of a person marrying
another person while still being
lawfully married to a third
person. Bigamy is listed (and
sometimes prosecuted) as a crime
in most western countries. For
example, in the United States,
by law, a married person is
obliged not to marry again as
long as their first marriage
continues.
Serial
monogamy
-
The phrase serial monogamy
has been used to describe the
lifestyle of persons who have
repeatedly married and divorced
multiple partners.
Other
forms of nonmonogamy
-
Other forms of nonmonogamous
relationships are discussed at
Forms of nonmonogamy. One
modern variant is
polyamory.
Patterns
of occurrence worldwide
According to the
Ethnographic Atlas Codebook,
of the 1231 societies noted, 186
were monogamous. 453 had
occasional polygyny, 588 had
more frequent polygyny, and 4
had polyandry.[2]
At the same time, even within
societies which allow polygyny,
the actual practice of polygyny
occurs relatively rarely. There
are exceptions: in
Senegal, for example, nearly
47 percent of marriages are
multiple.[5]
To take on more than one wife
often requires considerable
resources: this may put polygamy
beyond the means of the vast
majority of people within those
societies. Such appears the case
in many traditional
Islamic societies, and in
Imperial China. Within
polygynous societies, multiple
wives often become a
status symbol denoting
wealth and power. Similarly,
within societies that formally
prohibit polygamy, social
opinion may look favorably on
persons maintaining mistresses
or engaging in
serial monogamy.
Some observers[who?]
detect a social preference for
polygyny in disease-prone (especially
tropical) climates, and
speculate that (from a potential
mother's viewpoint) perceived
quality of paternal genes may
favour the practice there.[citation
needed] The
countervailing situation
allegedly prevails in harsher
climates, where (once again from
a potential mother's viewpoint)
reliable paternal care as
exhibited in monogamous
pair-bonding outweighs the
importance of paternal genes.[citation
needed]
Africa
Polygamy existed all over
Africa as an aspect of culture
or/and religion. Plural
marriages have been more common
than not in the
history of Africa. Many
African societies saw children
as a form of wealth thus the
more children a family had the
more powerful it was. Thus
polygamy was part of empire
building. It was only during the
colonial era that plural
marriage was perceived as taboo.
Esther Stanford, an
African-focused lawyer, states
that this decline was encouraged
because the issues of property
ownership conflicted with
European colonial interest.[6]
It is very common in
West Africa (Muslim and
traditionalist).
South
Africa
In
South Africa,
traditionalists commonly
practice polygamy.[7]
The leader of the
ANC,
Jacob Zuma is also openly in
favor of plural marriages, being
married to numerous wives
himself.[8][9]
The wives live in small houses
in a circle around the master
compound.[10]
Sudan
Polygamy is encouraged in
countries such as
Sudan, where President
Omar Hassan al-Bashir has
encouraged multiple marriages to
increase the population.[11]
Asia
The
Chinese culture of
Confucianism and thus the
practice of polygamy spread from
China to the areas that are now
Korea and
Japan. Before the
establishment of the modern
democratic mode, Eastern
countries permitted a similar
practice of polygamy.[12]
South
Asia
Polygyny is illegal in India
for Hindus under the
Hindu marriage Act. It has
disappeared completely in urban
areas and among the cosmopolitan
middle class among Hindus. It
has, however, been reported in
rural areas and among the lower
classes of Hindus. Polygyny,
permitted under
Islamic law, is present
amongst some Muslims in South
Asia. Polygamy is considerably
more widespread among Hindus in
Nepal than in India.
Mongolia
In
Mongolia, there has been
discussion about legalizing
polygamy to reduce the imbalance
of the male and female
population.[13]
Thailand
Until polygamy was outlawed
by
King Rama VI, it was
expected that wealthy or
upper-class Thai men were
historically recognized to
maintain mansions consisting of
multiple wives and their
children in the same residence.
Among the
royalty and courtiers in the
past, wives were classified as
principal, secondary, and
slave. Today, the tradition
of minor wives still remains,
but the practice is different
from that of the past. Due to
the expense involved, minor
wives are mostly limited to the
wealthy men. While a "proper
woman" (Kulasatrii;
Thai: กุลสตรี) must remain
faithful to her husband, there
were no equivalent rules in
history mandating fidelity in
the "virtuous man."
Regardless of the historical
acceptance, male polygamy or
plural marriage is no longer
legally or socially acceptable
in the contemporary Thai
society. However, the practice
of having "minor wives" (Mia-Noi:
เมียน้อย) continues in modern
days in secrecy from the "primary
wife" (Mia-Luang: เมียหลวง).[14]
Almost all married Thai women
today object to this practice,
and indeed for many it has been
grounds for divorce.[15]
Minor wives are viewed with
contempt by the Thai society
along the lines of being amoral
women or home breakers.[16]
China
Since the
Han Dynasty, technically,
Chinese men could have only one
wife. However, throughout the
thousands of years of
Chinese history, it was
common for rich Chinese men to
have a wife and various
concubines. Polygamy is a
by-product of the tradition of
emphasis on procreation and the
continuity of the father's
family name.[citation
needed]
Before the establishment of the
Republic of China, it was
lawful to have a wife and
multiple concubines within
Chinese marriage. An emperor,
government officials or rich
merchants could have hundreds of
concubines after marrying his
first wife. After the Communist
Revolution in 1949, polygamy was
banned via the Marriage Act of
1953.
Hong
Kong
In
Hong Kong, polygamy was
banned in October 1971.
[17] Some Hong Kong
businessmen[who?]
have concubines across the
border in mainland China, but
concubines do not have the legal
or social status of wives and so
this should not strictly be
called "polygamy". Kevin Murphy
of
The International Herald Tribune[18]
reports the cross-border
polygyny phenomenon in Hong Kong
in 1995.[19]
The traditional attitude
toward mistresses is reflected
in the saying: "wife is not as
good as
concubine, concubine is not
as good as
prostitute, prostitute is
not as good as secret affair,
secret affair is not as good as
the affair you want but can't
get" (妻不如妾, 妾不如妓, 妓不如偷, 偷不如偷不到).[citation
needed]
Patterns
of occurrence across religions
Buddhism
Marriage is considered a
secular issue in Buddhism.
According to Theravada Buddhism,
polygamy is discouraged and
extramatrial affairs are
considered sinful. It is said in
the Parabhava Sutta that "a man
who is not satisfied with one
woman and seeks out other women
is on the path to decline". In
Tibetan Buddhism, namely Tibetan
Vajrayana Buddhism, it is not
uncommon to take a consort in
addition to a spouse, though it
is namely for certain spiritual
practices that the spouse may
not be able/ready to participate
in—or if the husband/wife are at
different levels on their
spiritual path.[citation
needed] A
consort is appropriate in such
cases. Within this context,
either the husband or wife,
occasionally both, might take a
spiritual consort. This is known
as Consort Practice, and there
are specific teachings and
meditations that go along with
it. Consort Practice is often
very private, however, and not
openly discussed outside of
followers of Tibetan Vajrayana—which
tends to be a very private form
of Buddhism in general – hence
it is not very well known.
Husbands and wives also engage
in Consort Practice together,
monogamously.
The 2008 BBC documentary
series "A Year in Tibet",
however, recorded three distinct
cases of polyandry in and around
the city of Gyantse alone (the
pregnant farmer's wife in
episode 1, "The Visit"; Yangdron
in episode 2, "Three Husbands
and a Wedding"; and the young
monk, Tsephun's, mother in
episode 5, "A Tale of Three
Monks"). In "Three Husbands and
a Wedding", a 17-year-old girl
is also shown being forced into
a marriage that would have been
polyandrous, except that the
younger, 12-year-old, brother
had to attend school on the
wedding day (his parents hint
that he will marry his older
brother's new wife at a later
date). The programs include
statements from the women
involved that indicate they did
not enter the polyandrous
marriages willingly, and
commentary that indicates young
women in Tibet are routinely
forced by their families into
polyandrous marriages with two
or more brothers.
Polyandry (especially
fraternal polyandry) is also
common among Buddhists in
Bhutan, Ladakh, and other parts
of the Indian subcontinent.
Hinduism
Both polygyny and polyandry
were practiced in many sections
of
Hindu society in ancient
times. Concerning
polyandry, in the ancient
Hindu epic, Mahabharata,
Draupadi marries the five
Pandava brothers. Regarding
polygny,
Ramayan, father of
Ram, king Dasharath has
three wives, but Ram has pledged
himself just one wife. The
god-figure Lord
Krishna, the 9th incarnation
of the Hindu god Vishnu had
16,108 wives which were his most
sincere devotees. Historically,
kings routinely took concubines
(such as the
Vijaynagara emperor,
Krishnadevaraya. In the
post-Vedic periods, polygamy
declined in Hinduism, and is now
considered immoral
[6], although it is thought
that some sections of Hindu
society still practice
polyandry, along with areas
of Tibet, Nepal, and China.
After independence from the
British, religions in which
polygamy was still practiced
were allowed to continue. Under
the Hindu Marriage Act, polygamy
is considered illegal for Hindus,
Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs
[7]. However, Muslim men in
India are allowed to have
multiple wives. Marriage laws in
India are dependent upon the
religion of the subject in
question.[20]
Judaism
Biblical
practice
The Hebrew scriptures
document approximately forty
polygamists, including such
figures as
Abraham,[21]
Jacob,[22]
David and
Solomon,[23]
with little or no further remark
on their polygamy as such.
In general, however, monogamy
was considered the ideal state,[24]
with multiple marriage a
realistic alternative in the
case of famine, widowhood, or
female infertility.[25]
One source of polygamy was the
practice of
levirate marriage, wherein a
man was required to marry and
support his deceased brother's
widow, as mandated by
Deuteronomy 25:5-10.
The
Torah, Judaism's central
text, includes a few specific
regulations on the practice of
polygamy, such as
Exodus 21:10, which states
that multiple marriages are not
to diminish the status of the
first wife (specifically, her
right to food, clothing and
conjugal relations).
Deuteronomy 21:15-17, states
that a man must award the
inheritance due to a first-born
son to the son who was actually
born first, even if he hates
that son's mother and likes
another wife more; (though this
is typically interpreted as
referring to divorce),[26]
and
Deuteronomy 17:17 states
that the king shall not have too
many wives.[27]
The king's behavior is condemned
by Prophet Samuel in
1Samuel 8.
Exodus 21:10 also speaks of
Jewish concubines. Israeli
lexicographer Vadim Cherny
argues that the Torah carefully
distinguishes concubines and
"sub-standard" wives with prefix
"to", lit. "took to wives."[28]
The monogamy of the
Roman Empire was the cause
of two explanatory notes in the
writings of
Josephus describing how the
polygamous marriages of Herod
were permitted under Jewish
custom.[29]
Modern
practice
In the modern day,
Rabbinic Judaism has
essentially outlawed polygamy.
Ashkenazi Jews have followed
Rabbenu Gershom's ban since
the 11th century.[30]
Some
Sephardi and
Mizrahi Jews (particularly
those from
Yemen and
Iran) discontinued polygamy
much more recently, as they
emigrated to countries where it
was forbidden. The
State of Israel has severely
limited the ability for Jews to
enter polygamous marriages,[31]
but instituted provisions for
existing polygamous families
immigrating from countries where
the practice was legal.
Among
Karaite Jews, who do not
adhere to Rabbinic
interpretations of the Torah,
polygamy is almost non-existent
today. Like other Jews, Karaites
interpret Leviticus 18:18 to
mean that a man can only take a
second wife if his first wife
gives her consent (Keter Torah
on Leviticus, pp.96—97) and
Karaites interpret Exodus 21:10
to mean that a man can only take
a second wife if he is capable
of maintaining the same level of
marital duties due to his first
wife; the marital duties are 1)
food, 2) clothing, and 3) sexual
gratification. Because of these
two biblical limitations and
because nearly all countries
outlaw it, polygamy is
considered highly impractical,
and there are only a few known
cases of it among Karaite Jews
today.
Christianity
Saint
Augustine saw a conflict
with Old Testament polygamy. He
writes in The Good of
Marriage (chapter 15) that,
although it "was lawful among
the ancient fathers: whether it
be lawful now also, I would not
hastily pronounce. For there is
not now necessity of begetting
children, as there then was,
when, even when wives bear
children, it was allowed, in
order to a more numerous
posterity, to marry other wives
in addition, which now is
certainly not lawful." He
refrained from judging the
patriarchs, but did not deduce
from their practice the ongoing
acceptability of polygamy. In
chapter 7, he wrote, "Now indeed
in our time, and in
keeping with
Roman custom, it is no
longer allowed to take another
wife, so as to have more than
one wife living." [emphasis
added]
The New Testament authors
seem to prefer monogamy from
church leaders. Paul writes in
1Timothy 3:2, " A bishop then
must be blameless, the husband
of one wife, vigilant, sober, of
good behaviour, given to
hospitality, apt to teach;"
Something similar is repeated in
the first chapter of the book of
Titus.
However, the Roman Catholic
Church has subsequently taught
on more fundamental grounds that
"polygamy is not in accord with
the moral law. [Conjugal]
communion is radically
contradicted by polygamy; this,
in fact, directly negates the
plan of God which was revealed
from the beginning, because it
is contrary to the equal
personal dignity of men and
women who in matrimony give
themselves with a love that is
total and therefore unique and
exclusive." (Catholic
Cathechism, para. 2387, Vatican
website). This is also the
normal position among Protestant
Churches, and it can therefore
be said that the mainstream
Christian position is to reject
polygamy in principle.
Periodically, Christian
reform movements that have aimed
at rebuilding Christian doctrine
based on the Bible alone (sola
scriptura) have at least
temporarily accepted polygamy as
a Biblical practice. For example,
during the
Protestant Reformation, in a
document referred to simply as
"Der Beichtrat" (or
"The Confessional Advice" ),[32]
Martin Luther granted the
Landgrave
Philip of Hesse, who, for
many years, had been living "constantly
in a state of adultery and
fornication,"[33]
a dispensation to take a second
wife. The double marriage was to
be done in secret however, to
avoid public scandal.[34]
Some fifteen years earlier, in a
letter to the Saxon Chancellor
Gregor Brück, Luther stated
that he could not "forbid a
person to marry several wives,
for it does not contradict
Scripture." ("Ego sane fateor,
me non posse prohibere, si quis
plures velit uxores ducere, nec
repugnat sacris literis.")[35]
"On February 14, 1650, the
parliament at Nürnberg decreed
that, because so many men were
killed during the Thirty Years’
War, the churches for the
following ten years could not
admit any man under the age of
60 into a monastery. Priests and
ministers not bound by any
monastery were allowed to marry.
Lastly, the decree stated that
every man was allowed to marry
up to ten women. The men were
admonished to behave honorably,
provide for their wives properly,
and prevent animosity among them."[36][37][38][39][40]
The modern trend towards
frequent divorce and remarriage
is sometimes referred to by
conservative Christians as
'serial polygamy'.[citation
needed] In
contrast, sociologists and
anthropologists refer to this as
'serial
monogamy', since it is a
series of monogamous (i.e. not
polygamous) relationships.[41]
The first term highlights the
multiplicity of marriages
throughout the life-cycle, the
second the non-simultaneous
nature of these marriages.
In Sub-Saharan Africa, there
has often been a tension between
the Christian churches'
insistence on monogamy and
traditional polygamy. In some
instances in recent times there
have been moves for
accommodation; in others
churches have resisted such
moves strongly. African
Independent Churches have
sometimes referred to those
parts of the Old Testament which
describe polygamy in defending
the practice.
Mormonism
-
-
See also:
Polygamy in the United
States and
List of Latter Day Saint
practitioners of plural
marriage
The history of Mormon
polygamy begins with claims that
Mormonism founder
Joseph Smith received a
revelation from God on July 17,
1831 that some Mormon men would
be allowed to practice "plural
marriage". This was later
set down in the
Doctrine and Covenants by
the
The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints (LDS
Church).[42]
Despite Smith's revelation, the
1835 edition of the 101st
Section of the Doctrine and
Covenants, written before the
doctrine of plural marriage
began to be practiced, publicly
condemned polygamy. This
scripture was used by
John Taylor in 1850 to quash
Mormon polygamy rumors in
Liverpool, England.[43]
Polygamy was illegal in the
state of
Illinois[44]
during the 1839-44
Nauvoo era when several top
Mormon leaders including Smith,
Brigham Young and
Heber C. Kimball took plural
wives. Mormon elders who
publicly taught that all men
were commanded to enter plural
marriage were subject to harsh
discipline.[45]
On June 7, 1844 the
Nauvoo Expositor
criticized Smith for plural
marriage. The Nauvoo city
council declared the Nauvoo
Expositor press a nuisance
and ordered Smith, as Nauvoo's
mayor, to order the city
marshall to destroy the paper
and its press. This
controversial decision led to
Smith going to
Carthage Jail where he was
killed by a mob on June 27,
1844. The main body of Mormons
left Nauvoo and followed Brigham
Young to
Utah where the practice of
plural marriage continued.
In 1852
Apostle
Orson Pratt publicly
acknowledged the practice of
plural marriage through a sermon
he gave. Additional sermons by
top Mormon leaders on the
virtues of polygamy followed.[46]
Controversy followed when
writers began to publish works
condemning polygamy. The key
plank of the
Republican Party's 1856
platform was "to prohibit in
the territories those twin
relics of barbarism, polygamy
and slavery".[47]
In 1862,
Congress issued the
Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act
which clarified that the
practice of polygamy was illegal
in all
U.S. territories. The LDS
Church believed that their
religiously-based practice of
plural marriage was protected by
the
United States Constitution,[48]
however, the unanimous 1878
Supreme Court decision
Reynolds v. United States
declared that polygamy was not
protected by the Constitution,
based on the longstanding legal
principle that "laws are made
for the government of actions,
and while they cannot interfere
with mere religious belief and
opinions, they may with
practices."[49]
Increasingly harsh
anti-polygamy legislation in the
U.S. led some Mormons to
emigrate to
Canada and
Mexico. In 1890, LDS Church
president
Wilford Woodruff issued a
public declaration (the
Manifesto) announcing the
official discontinuance of
polygamy.
Anti-Mormon sentiment waned,
as did opposition to statehood
for
Utah. The
Smoot Hearings in 1904
spurred the LDS Church to issue
a
Second Manifesto against
polygamy. By 1910 the LDS Church
excommunicated those who
practiced polygamy. Even so,
many plural husbands and wives
continued to cohabit until their
deaths in the 1940s and 1950s.[50]
Enforcement of the 1890
Manifesto caused various
splinter groups to leave the
LDS Church in order to continue
the practice of plural marriage.[51]
Polygamy among these groups
persists today in
Utah and neighboring states
as well as in the spin-off
colonies. Polygamist churches of
Mormon origin are often referred
to as "Mormon
fundamentalist" even though
they are not a part of the
mainstream LDS church. Such
fundamentalists often use an
1886 revelation to
John Taylor as the basis for
their authority to continue the
practice of plural marriage.[52]
The
Salt Lake Tribune stated
in 2005 there were as many as
37,000 fundamentalists with less
than half of them living in
polygamous households.[53]
Islam
-
In Islam, polygamy is allowed
for men, with the specific
limitation that they can only
have up to four wives at any one
time. The
Qur'an also states that men
who choose this route must deal
with their wives as fairly as
possible, doing everything that
they can to spend equal amounts
of time and money on each one of
them. If the husband cannot deal
with his wives fairly, one is
enough. Women on the other hand,are
only allowed the one Husband.
Although many
Muslim countries still
retain traditional
Islamic law which permits
polygamy, certain elements
within some Muslim societies
challenge its acceptability. For
example, polygamy is prohibited
by law in
Bosnia-Herzegovina,
Tunisia and
Turkey.
Polygamy, and laws concerning
polygamy, differ greatly
throughout the Islamic world and
form a very complex and diverse
background from nation to nation.
Whereas in some Muslim countries
it may be fairly common, in most
others it is often rare or
non-existent. However, there are
certain core fundamentals which
are found in most Muslim
countries where the practice
occurs. According to traditional
Islamic law, a man may take up
to four wives, and each of those
wives must have her own property,
assets, and dowry. Usually the
wives have little to no contact
with each other and lead
separate, individual lives in
their own houses, and sometimes
in different cities, though they
all share the same husband.
Muhammad, who had a monogamous
marriage with Khadija for twenty
five years till her death,
married many of his wives
because they were war widows who
were left with nothing and took
care of them. Thus, polygamy is
an exception rather than the
rule and is traditionally
restricted to men who can manage
things, and in some countries it
is illegal for a man to marry
multiple wives if he is unable
to afford to take care of each
of them properly.
In the modern Islamic world,
polygamy is mainly found in
traditionalist Arab cultures[citation
needed],
Saudi Arabia, West and East
Africa (In Sudan it is
encouraged from the president)[54]
and the
United Arab Emirates for
instance[citation
needed],
whereas in secular Arab states
like
Tunisia and non-Arab
countries with Muslim population,
Turkey for example, it is
banned. However, polygamy is
still practiced in
Malaysia, a non-Arab Muslim
country, but there are
restrictions as to how it can be
practiced.[55]
In traditionalist cultures where
polygamy is still commonplace
and legal, Muslim polygamists do
not separate themselves from the
society at large, since there
would be no need as each spouse
leads a separate life from the
others.
Legal
situation
-
See also:
Polygamy in the United
States
Most
western countries do not
recognize polygamous marriages,
and consider
bigamy a crime. Several
countries also prohibit people
from living a polygamous
lifestyle.
In some States of the United
States, the criminalization of a
polygamous lifestyle originated
as
anti-Mormon laws, although
they are rarely enforced.[56]
Polygamists may find it
harder dealing with government
agencies, such as obtaining
legal immigrant status.
By
country
Current
proponents and opponents
Secular
David Friedman and
Steve Sailer have argued
that polygamy tends to benefit
most women and disadvantage most
men, under the assumption that
most men and women do not
practise it. The idea is firstly
that many women would prefer
half or one third of someone
especially appealing to being
the single spouse of someone
that doesn't provide as much
economic utility to them.
Secondly, that the remaining
women have a better market for
finding a spouse themselves. Say
that 20% of women are married to
10% of men, that leaves 90% of
men to compete over the
remaining 80% of women. Friedman
uses this viewpoint to argue in
favor of legalizing polygamy,
while Sailer uses it to argue
against legalizing it.
In the US, the
Libertarian Party supports
complete decriminalization of
polygamy as part of a general
belief that the government
should not regulate marriages.
Individualist feminism and
advocates such as
Wendy McElroy also support
the freedom for adults to
voluntarily enter polygamous
marriages.
In Uruguay the "Colorado
Party" supports polygamy.[citation
needed]
The
American Civil Liberties Union
of Utah, USA, is opposed to
Utah's law against bigamy.[59]
Those who advocate a
Federal Marriage Amendment
to the American Constitution to
prohibit
same-sex marriage generally
word their proposed laws to also
prohibit polygamy. Many
proponents of
same-sex marriage are also
in favour of maintaining current
statutory prohibitions against
polygamy, arguing that while
same-sex marriages do not
involve toleration of
pedophilia amongst
practitioners, the same is not
true of most polygamists in the
United States..[citation
needed]
Stanley Kurtz, a fellow at
the Hudson Institute, lamented
the modern arguments
increasingly being made by
various intellectuals who call
for de-criminalizing polygamy.
Kurtz concluded, "Marriage,
as its ultramodern critics would
like to say, is indeed about
choosing one's partner, and
about freedom in a society that
values freedom. But that's not
the only thing it is about. As
the Supreme Court justices who
unanimously decided Reynolds in
1878 understood, marriage is
also about sustaining the
conditions in which freedom can
thrive. Polygamy in all its
forms is a recipe for social
structures that inhibit and
ultimately undermine social
freedom and democracy. A
hard-won lesson of Western
history is that genuine
democratic self-rule begins at
the hearth of the monogamous
family."[60]
Religious
The
Roman Catholic Church
clearly condemns polygamy; the
Catechism of the Catholic Church
lists it in paragraph 2387 under
the head "Other offenses against
the dignity of marriage" and
states that it "is not in accord
with the moral law." Also in
paragraph 1645 under the head
"The Goods and Requirements of
Conjugal Love" states "The unity
of marriage, distinctly
recognized by our Lord, is made
clear in the equal personal
dignity which must be accorded
to man and wife in mutual and
unreserved affection. Polygamy
is contrary to conjugal love
which is undivided and exclusive."
Currently the vast majority
of Protestant congregations take
the Catholic view on polygamy.[citation
needed]
The illegality of polygamy in
certain areas creates, according
to certain Bible passages,
additional arguments against it.
Paul of Tarsus writes "submit
to the authorities, not only
because of possible punishment
but also because of conscience"
(Romans 13:5), for "the
authorities that exist have been
established by God." (Romans
13:1)
St Peter concurs when he
says to "submit yourselves for
the Lord's sake to every
authority instituted among men:
whether to the king, as the
supreme authority, or to
governors, who are sent by him
to punish those who do wrong and
to commend those who do right."
(1 Peter 2:13,14)
Pro-polygamists argue that, as
long as polygamists currently do
not obtain legal marriage
licenses for additional spouses,
no enforced laws are being
broken any more than when
monogamous couples who similarly
co-habitate without a marriage
license.[61]
At the present time,
The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints supports
enforcing laws against polygamy,
although historically this
denomination practiced polygamy
which they considered to be a
principle revealed by God, and
fought vocally against those
seeking to establish such laws.
Today, the church will
excommunicate any member found
to be practicing polygamy.
Controversial
Christian vegetarian
activist and leader
Nathan Braun implies a
positive stance towards polygamy
in his fourth edition of The
History and Philosophy of
Marriage.
Polygamy
in fiction and popular culture
The quip "Bigamy is having
one spouse too many. Monogamy is
the same." is popularly
misattributed to
Oscar Wilde.
A popular joke with
Mark Twain has Twain asked
to cite a Scripture reference
that forbids polygamy, and he
responds with, "No man can serve
two masters."
Science
fiction, utopias, dystopias
A number of writers have
expressed their views on
polygamy by writing about a
fictional world in which it is
the most common type of
relationship. These worlds tend
to be
utopian or
dystopian in nature. For
instance,
Robert A. Heinlein uses this
theme in a number of novels,
such as
Stranger in a Strange Land.
Polygamy is practiced by the
Fremen in
Frank Herbert's
Dune as a means to
pinpoint male infertility. It is
socially accepted as long as the
man provides for all wives
equally. Cultures described
within the
Dune novel series have
intentional similarities to
Islamic, Arabic, and other
cultures – i.e. desert cultures.
Similarly, the
Aiel society in
Robert Jordan's
The Wheel of Time series
practice a form of polygamy, in
which multiple women may marry
the same man; in that fictional
culture, women are the ones who
propose marriage. Among Aiel,
sisters or very close friends
who have adopted each other as
sisters, will often marry the
same man, so that he will not
come between them.
Ursula K. Le Guin describes
a planet
O, where the cultural norm
is a "sedoretu" or four-person
marriage (a set combination of
both genders and sexual
orientations).
Dan Simmons describes a
culture of three-person
marriages (any gender ratio) in
his book
Endymion. In
David Weber's
Honor Harrington series,
the inhabitants of the planet
Grayson practice polygamy (polygyny)
due to the human colonists to
the planet acquiring a genetic
defect that gave rise to a large
women-to-men birth ratio
combined with a high
infant mortality.
Wen Spencer's
science fiction novel
A Brother's Price
describes a society where men
are very rare and protected, and
multiple sisters typically marry
one man
In the
Star Trek television series
Enterprise, the ship's
physician,
Dr. Phlox (who is a
Denobulan) has three wives, each
of whom has three husbands of
her own (including him). One of
his wives seemed to be
interested in having
extramarital relations with a
human, which Phlox himself did
not oppose, and even encouraged.
It has also been stated that the
Andorian species enter into
group marriages (although
whether this is due to societal
custom or biological necessity
has not been firmly established.)
In the
Sci-Fi television series
Babylon 5 the Centauris
allow for men to have more than
one wife. In
Star Wars
Expanded Universe, it is
explained that
Cereans (like
Ki-Adi-Mundi) have a much
higher birth-rate of girls than
boys. Thus, every male Cerean
must have one wife and multiple
"honor wives", to increase the
chance of giving birth to
another male. Jedi Cerean
Ki-Adi-Mundi was allowed to
marry multiple times, although
Jedis were not supposed to marry
at his time; but Ki-Adi-Mundi
got a dispense of that norm.
Prehistoric
and historic fiction
Jean M. Auel in the
pre-historic
Earth's Children series
depicted several instances of "co-mating,"
where a person could have more
than one mate. Examples included
the headwoman Tulie in the
Mammoth Hunters, and a
man who married a pair of twins
in the
Shelters of Stone. Also
of note was Vinavec, the headman
of the Mammoth Camp who wished
to mate with the protagonist
Ayla and was willing to take
her Promised, Ranec, implying a
bisexual relationship as well.
In
Duke of the Mount Deer/The
Deer and the Cauldron
the Hong Kong writer,
Louis Cha (Jin Yung),
assigned seven willing wives of
different characters to the very
capable hero Wai-Siu-Bo (Wei-Xiao-Bao).
This politics, office-politics,
romance, and kung-fu survival
story was based in the early
Ching (Qing) Dynasty (of Kangxi
reign 1654–1722). The saga has
been made into films and TV
series several times since the
1960s. Famous actors like
Tony Leung (Leung Chiu Wai),
Steven Chow (Chow Sing Chi),
and
Dicky Cheung (Cheung-Wai-Kin)
have played the male role.
Contemporary
settings
Noted libertarian author
L. Neil Smith included a
character married to two sisters
in his book
The American Zone. The
dominant culture in the novel
sees one's religion and personal
living accommodations as no one
else's business, and "acts of
capitalism between consenting
adults" as the norm instead of
something immoral.
A Home at the End of the World
is a novel by
Michael Cunningham about a
polygamous family. It was later
adapted into a film. Both
explore issues of homosexuality
and families.
Big Love is an
HBO series about a
polygamous family in Utah in the
first decade of the 21st century.
In the series, Bill Henrickson
has three wives and seven
children, who belong to a
fundamentalist Mormon splinter
group. Big Love explores
the complex legal, moral, and
religious issues associated with
polygamy in Utah. Henrickson's
three wives each have separate
houses beside one another, with
a shared backyard. By outward
appearances, he lives with his
primary wife, and has two "friends"
living close by, while in
reality taking turns sleeping at
a different house each night.
Henrickson effectively balances
his work, the continuing demands
of his wives, and his wives'
relatives. Random House
published
David Ebershoff's novel
The 19th Wife in 2008.
It is about
Ann Eliza Young, one of
Brigham Young's wives, and the
legacy of Mormon polygamy in the
United States today.
See
also
References
-
^
Polygamy at
socialsciencedictionary.org
-
^
a
b
Ethnographic Atlas
Codebook derived
from George P. Murdock’s
Ethnographic Atlas
recording the marital
composition of 1231
societies from 1960-1980
-
^ (Linda Stone,
Kinship and Gender,
2006, Westview, 3rd ed,
ch 6)The
Center for Research on
Tibet Papers on
Tibetan Marriage and
Polyandry. Accessed:
October 1, 2006
-
^ Goldstein,
Pahari and Tibetan
Polyandry Revisited,
Ethnology. 17(3):
325-327, 1978, from
The Center for Research
on Tibet. Accessed:
October 1, 2007
-
^ Diouf, Nafi
(May 2, 2004). "Polygamy
hangs on in Africa",
The Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel.
-
^
Polygamy in Africa -
Polygamy in Africa
-
^
South Africa Polygamy
debate
-
^
Zuma charmed wives and
nation The
Australian
-
^
Zuma to wed on Saturday
M&G
-
^
South Africa Polygamist
Christians
-
^
Omar Hassan al-Bashir
has urged Sudanese men
to take more than one
wife to increase the
population
-
^
The Legacy Lingers On:
Korean Confucianism and
the Erosion of Women’s
Rights by Hildi Kang,
Research Fellow, Center
for Korean Studies,
University of
California, Berkeley]
-
^
?? — article in
Chinese
-
^ Interpersonal
Heterosexual Behaviors
of Thai People,
Extramarital Sex
-
^
The rights of husband
and wife, Family Law
in Thailand
-
^ A research on
Thai view of sexuality
and sexual behavior
funded by the
Rockefeller Foundation
and conducted jointly by
the Institute of
Population Studies,
Chulalongkorn University
and Mahidol University,
Bangkok, the Population
Studies Center,
University of Michigan
and the Department of
Sociology, University of
Washington
-
^
Hong Kong, article
by Man-Lun Ng, M.D.;
part of
"The International
Encyclopedia of
Sexuality" Volume I
– IV 1997–2001, Edited
by Robert T. Francoeur
-
^
Graeme Lang, Josephine
Smart (2002). "Migration
and the “second wife” in
South China: Toward
cross-border polygamy".
The International
Migration Review
36 (5): 546–569.
-
^
Hong Kong Targets Its
Two-Family Men,
Kevin Murphy,
International Herald
Tribune, Tuesday,
February 7, 1995
-
^
Marriages-Divorces
section at general
information website on
Indian laws by Sudhir
Shah & Associates
-
^ And Sarai
Abram's wife took Hagar
her maid the Egyptian,
after Abram had dwelt
ten years in the land of
Canaan, and gave her to
her husband Abram to be
his wife.Genesis
16:3
-
^
Leah,
Rachel,
Bilhah and
Zilpah
-
^
1Kings 11:3: He had
seven hundred wives of
royal birth and three
hundred concubines, and
his wives led him
astray.
-
^
[1]
-
^
[2]
-
^
Deuteronomy 21:15-17
-
^
Judaica Press Complete
Tanach, Devarim -
Chapter 17 from
Chabad.org
-
^
Women, similar to wives
-
^ "The Jewish
Family: Metaphor and
Memory", David Charles
Kraemer, p21, Oxford
University Press US,
1989,
ISBN 0195054679
-
^
Judaism and Polygamy:
"Originally, Gershom's
ban was limited in time
to the year 1260," and a
man "could marry more
than one wife if he
obtained the special
permission of 100 rabbis
in 3 countries."
-
^ The law
requires to obtain
permission of the chief
rabbis.
-
^
Letter to Philip of
Hesse, December 10,
1539,
De Wette-Seidemann,
6:238-244
-
^ The Life of
Luther Written by
Himself, p.251
[3]
-
^
James Bowling Mozley
Essays, Historical
and Theological.
1:403-404 Excerpts from
Der Beichtrat.[4]
-
^ Letter to the
Chancellor Gregor Brück,[5]
January 13, 1524,
De Wette 2:459.
-
^ Larry O.
Jensen,
A Genealogical Handbook
of German Research
(Rev. Ed., 1980) p. 59.
-
^ Joseph Alfred
X. Michiels, Secret
History of the Austrian
Government and of its
Systematic Persecutions
of Protestants
(London: Chapman and
Hall, 1859) p. 85 (copy
at Google Books), the
author stating that he
is quoting from a copy
of the legislation.
-
^ William Walker
Rockwell, Die
Doppelehe des Landgrafen
Philipp von Hessen
(Marburg, 1904), p. 280,
n. 2 (copy at Google
Books), which reports
the number of wives
allowed was two.
-
^ Leonhard
Theobald, “Der
angebliche
Bigamiebeschluß des
fränkischen Kreistages”
[“The So-called Bigamy
Decision of the
Franconian Kreistag”],
Beitrage zur
Bayerischen
kirchengeschichte
[Contributions to
Bavarian Church History]
23 (1916 – bound volume
dated 1917) Erlangen:
199-200 (Theobald
reporting that the
Franconian Kreistag did
not hold session between
1645 and 1664, and that
there is no record of
such a law in the extant
archives of Nürnberg,
Ansbach, or Bamberg,
Theobald believing that
the editors of the
Fränkisches Archiv must
have misunderstood a
draft of some other
legislation from 1650).
-
^ Alfred Altmann,
"Verein für Geschichte
der Stadt Nürnburg,"
Jahresbericht über das
43 Vereinsjahr 1920
[Annual Report for the
43rd Year 1920 of the
Historical Society of
the City of Nuremberg] (Nürnberg
1920): 13-15 (Altmann
reporting a lecture he
had given discussing the
polygamy permission said
to have been granted in
Nuremberg in 1650,
Altmann characterizing
the Fränkisches Archiv
as "merely a popular
journal, not an edition
of state documents," and
describing the tradition
as "a literary
fantasy").
-
^
Fisher, Helen. The
First Sex.
Ballantine Books.
pp. 271–72, 276.
ISBN 0-449-91260-4.
-
^
Doctrine and Covenants
132 as found at
lds.org
-
^ THREE NIGHTS
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Between The Revds. C. W.
Cleeve, James Robertson,
and Philip Cater, And
Elder John Taylor, Of
The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day
Saints, At
Boulogne-Sur-Mer,
France. Chairman, Rev.
K. Groves, M.A.,
Assisted By Charles
Townley, LL.D., and Mr.
Luddy. pg 8-9
-
^ Greiner &
Sherman, Revised Laws of
Illinois, 1833, pg.
198-199
-
^
Times and Seasons, vol.
5, pg. 423, February
1, 1844
-
^
JD 11:128 Brigham
Young - June 18, 1865 -
"Since the founding of
the Roman empire
monogamy has prevailed
more extensively than in
times previous to that.
The founders of that
ancient empire were
robbers and women
stealers, and made laws
favoring monogamy in
consequence of the
scarcity of women among
them, and hence this
monogamic system which
now prevails throughout
Christendom, and which
had been so fruitful a
source of prostitution
and whoredom throughout
all the Christian
monogamic cities of the
Old and New World, until
rottenness and decay are
at the root of their
institutions both
national and religious."
-
^
GOP Convention of 1856
in Philadelphia from
the Independence Hall
Association website
-
^
Free Exercise Clause -
First Amendment
-
^
Reynolds v. United
States at
findlaw.com
-
^
Polygamy entry in
the Utah Historical
Encyclopedia,
University of Utah,
1994.
-
^
"The Primer" -
Helping Victims of
Domestic Violence and
Child Abuse in
Polygamous Communities.
A joint report from the
offices of the Attorney
Generals of Arizona and
Utah. (2006)
-
^
"An 1886 Revelation to
John Taylor"
-
^
"LDS splinter groups
growing" by Brooke
Adams, August 9, 2005 -
SLT Article ID:
10BF07C805DE5990
-
^
Omar Hassan al-Bashir,
has urged Sudanese men
to take more than one
wife to increase the
population
-
^
Women's Aid Organisation:
Know Your Rights,
Polygamy
-
^
Turley, Jonathan.
Polygamy laws expose our
own hypocrisy
-
^ "CBC
News in Depth: Polygamy".
CBC.ca (2008-04-25).
Retrieved on 2009-01-11.
-
^
1,000 men living legally
with multiple wives
despite fears over
exploitation
Times online
-
^
ACLU of Utah to Join
Polygamists in Bigamy
Fight, 7/16/1999
press release.
-
^
"Polygamy vs. Democracy"
The Weekly Standard,
June 5, 2006
-
^
"Law of the Land"
page at
BiblicalPolygamy.com
Bibliography
-
Cairncross, John (1974).
After Polygamy Was Made a
Sin: The Social History of
Christian Polygamy.
London: Routledge & Kegan
Paul.
ISBN 0-7100-7730-0.
- Campbell, James (1869).
"The
History and Philosophy of
Marriage".
Re-published online at
TruthBearer.org. First
published in Boston.
Retrieved on August 5, 2005.
-
Chapman, Samuel A. (2001).
Polygamy, Bigamy and
Human Rights Law.
Xlibris Corp.
ISBN 1-4010-1244-2.
-
Hillman, Eugene. Polygamy
Reconsidered: African Plural
Marriage and the Christian
Churches. New York:
Orbis Books.
ISBN 0-88344-391-0.
-
Korotayev, Andrey
(2004). World Religions
and Social Evolution of the
Old World Oikumene
Civilizations: A
Cross-cultural Perspective
(First Edition ed.).
Lewiston, New York: Edwin
Mellen Press.
ISBN 0-7734-6310-0.
-
Van Wagoner, Richard S.
(1992).
Mormon Polygamy: A History
(2nd Ed. ed.). Utah:
Signature Books.
ISBN 0-941214-79-6.
-
Wilson, E. O. (2000).
Sociobiology: The New
Synthesis. Harvard Univ
Pr.
ISBN 0-674-00235-0.
External links
|
|
Zegg (Zentrum fuer experimentelle
GesellschaftsGestaltung), Rosa Luxemburg
Str. 89 - D 14806 BELZIG - Deutschland ()
Tel. 033841-59510
|
|
Da circa un decennio un’ottantina di persone a
Belzig, 80 km da Berlino, stanno dando luogo a uno
straordinario esperimento sociale. L’obiettivo che
le anima è la realizzazione della pace (personale e
interpersonale) e un modo di vita che non sia basato
sullo sfruttamento di altre parti del mondo.

Un laboratorio di sperimentazione
sociale
Ecologia, amore, sessualità, ricerca spirituale,
vita coi bambini, e il loro distillato sul piano
dell’impegno politico, costituiscono il cuore
della vita e della ricerca che si svolgono a
Zegg. Esperienze e riflessioni vengono diffuse
tramite corsi e seminari e sviluppate insieme
agli ospiti che transitano nella comunità.
L’economia
Lo
Zegg si finanzia essenzialmente con le entrate
derivanti dal lavoro congressuale e dagli
affitti pagati da famiglie e imprese residenti.
Imprese e persone appartenenti alla comunità
sono responsabili delle loro entrate. Accanto a
ciò c’è un grosso settore di economia
comunitaria che si esprime nel lavoro comune
all’interno della Zegg GmbH (società a
responsabilità limitata di cui sono soci i
residenti). La Zegg GmbH è proprietaria del
terreno e titolare dell’attività congressuale e
seminariale. Alcuni residenti sono dipendenti
della Società, mentre altri lavorano come liberi
professionisti o con imprese proprie dentro e
fuori Zegg.
Alla base del progetto Zegg c’è un’intuizione,
una visione, quella della persona inserita in
una solida rete di legami sociali. Una rete che
costituisce quel cespite prezioso che permette
alla persona di sentirsi confermata nella sua
identità e che la mette in condizione di
esprimere e mettere a disposizione degli altri
il proprio talento.
Essere trasparenti
Una
comunità è formata da una molteplicità di
persone che si completano e si sostengono nella
loro crescita, che vuol dire espressione del
proprio essere e assunzione di responsabilità.
La trasparenza dell’essere umano, verso se
stesso e verso gli altri, costituisce il
nocciolo del lavoro svolto a Zegg sulla persona.
Attraverso il ripetersi di rituali comunitari
come il Forum e la partecipazione a corsi, si
apprende a conoscere se stessi e a comunicare in
modo più consapevole, distinguendo il contenuto
cognitivo dei messaggi dalle loro implicazioni
emotive.
La comunità si riunisce a intervalli regolari in
molti modi, di domenica mattina per colloqui
spirituali, nel Plenum per informazioni e per
prendere decisioni, in occasione delle feste di
stagione, eventi musicali, azioni teatrali,
danza, sauna, dialoghi filosofici o lavoro
comune. Una forma importante di lavoro
comunitario è rappresentata dal Forum, forma
comunicativa ritualizzata e artistica. Il Forum
offre un palcoscenico sul quale vengono resi
visibili pensieri, sentimenti e moventi della
persona. Promuove la trasparenza nell’ambito
dell’amore, del potere e delle strutture
decisionali e aiuta a distinguere la discussione
oggettiva dai fatti emotivi, qualificandosi come
un contributo fondamentale alla conoscenza di sé
e alla costruzione della fiducia tra le persone.
Vivere l’ecologia
A
Zegg l’ecologia viene interpretata come
intreccio tra la vita umana e il corso
universale della natura. Con coerenza, viene
perseguita una relazione partecipativa con gli
elementi, la terra che ci circonda e i suoi
abitanti, gli animali e le piante. La natura non
è una cosa che si trova lì per essere usata o
sfruttata, ma è animata e proviene dalla stessa
nostra sorgente.
Il lavoro ecologico nella comunità è imperniato
attorno ai principi della permacoltura.
Permacoltura significa agricoltura durevole e
designa la coltivazione di prodotti alimentari e
l’uso di materiali da costruzione secondo
principi di sostenibilità. L’acqua utilizzata
proviene dal pozzo comunitario e l’acqua di
scolo viene purificata dal 1992 con un impianto
di filtraggio vegetale. La comunità sorge su un
terreno prevalentemente sabbioso, che contiene
poche sostanze nutritive e non trattiene
l’acqua. A ciò si supplisce con la produzione di
humus tramite materiale organico e favorendo
un’adeguata copertura vegetale.
Lo Zegg è riscaldato dal 1992 con trucioli di
legno, una materia prima che sta aumentando
d’importanza in ambito regionale e che
garantisce un rifornimento d’energia neutro dal
punto di vista della CO2. Dal 2003 è in progetto
l’installazione di un impianto di riscaldamento
centralizzato a legna. Alcune delle automobili
circolanti nella comunità funzionano a olio
vegetale.
Il territorio che circonda Zegg è coperto da
ampie estensioni di bosco di pino silvestre che,
nello spazio appartenente alla comunità, viene
trasformato in bosco misto naturale. Intorno
alle case viene data vita a una tipologia
paesaggistica di orto e parco, che permette a
residenti e ospiti di essere riforniti di frutta
e verdura, soprattutto in estate.
In edilizia, accanto alle metodologie
convenzionali c’è un uso crescente di tipologie
ecologiche sia negli interni che all’esterno.
Un capitolo interessante del progetto Zegg,
anche se a lunga scadenza, è quello
dell’integrazione regionale nel quadro di
un’economia sostenibile. A tal fine viene
impostata una collaborazione con persone e
progetti della zona, in modo da strutturare un
flusso economico e di materie prime su base
regionale. Si lavora a programmi studiati per le
regioni limitrofe al fine di promuovere
l’approvvigionamento di beni e l’erogazione di
servizi vitali dalle immediate vicinanze e
diminuire sempre più la dipendenza dai canali
distributivi industriali. Di questo progetto
fanno parte la produzione di generi alimentari e
di energia da biomassa (legno, semi oleosi,
biogas, ecc.), l’uso di materiali da costruzione
locali e il riciclaggio.
Cosa bolle in pentola
In
cucina si mangia vegetariano, a volte vegan,
anche se questo non significa che tutti gli
abitanti di Zegg siano vegetariani. I prodotti
provengono in gran parte da produzioni
biologiche locali o del commercio equo.
Alimentarsi è compiere una scelta politica che
tenga conto delle condizioni produttive
ecologiche e sociali dei generi di prima
necessità e di quelli voluttuari.
Amore e sessualità
L’amore e la sessualità rivestono a Zegg un
ruolo importante. Un concetto impiegato spesso è
quello di “amore libero”, che però viene
utilizzato con prudenza, dati i malintesi che
genera. Con quest’espressione a Zegg intendono
un amore che si esprima libero da paure per
tutti i partecipanti. La cultura moderna la
strutturato delle forme d’amore piuttosto rigide
come il feeling-di-una-notte e il legame fisso,
spesso destinato al naufragio. La rigidità di
queste modalità relazionali salta all’occhio
quando vengono messe a confronto con la piena
multiforme dei desideri individuali ai quali non
forniscono una risposta. Per questo si rendono
necessarie alternative che coniughino il
desiderio di stabilità e l’anelito al legame col
piacere della scoperta e dell’avventura. A Zegg
l’amore è un fatto politico, vale a dire che
accanto a riflessioni personali e intime è
sottoposto anche a considerazioni di carattere
generale. Da qui la domanda di quali circostanze
sociali, di quali modi di vivere abbiamo bisogno
per poter vivere i diversi e spesso
contraddittori aspetti dell’amore nella loro
verità più profonda.
|
|