PALERMO - Via Leonardo da Vinci, 111 - Tel. 091.6820331 - 331.2058233 - Email

§

FAMIGLIE e MATRIMONI


  • IL SENSO DI COLPA
    PENSIERO e LOGICA
    RELATIVITA'
    POLITICA
    FAMIGLIE e MATRIMONI
    PSICOLOGIA e TRASCENDENZA
    RELIGIONI  e SPIRITUALITA'
    BIBLIOTECA del Dott. Sergio Angileri


  • Istituzione del matrimonio
    Storia della famiglia
    Storia della famiglia (theomai)
    Nuove Famiglie

 

[Pagina precedente] [Home]
 


 
 

Di cosa ci occupiamo

Chi è lo psicoterapeuta

  Come si svolge la psicoterapia

Come procediamo

Organizzazione clinica

TARIFFARIO ORDINARIO

tariffario agevolato

PSICOTERAPIA CONVENZIONATA la nostra offerta

LA PSICOTERAPIA

Psicologo - Psicoterapeuta - Psichiatra - Neurologo

ELENCO DI PSICOLOGI E PSICOTERAPEUTI DI PALERMO consultazione gratuita delle schede dell' Albo

 

 

PRESENTAZIONE

Lo Studio PSIMED - Psicologia Medica Psicosomatica - è  uno Studio Specialistico di Psicologia e Medicina, ( psicologo - psicoterapeuta - neurologo - endocrinologo, dietologo e specialista del metabolismo - psichiatra - ginecologa ), altamente specializzato e operante a Palermo dal 1985.

Lo Studio PSIMED - Psicologia Medica Psicosomatica - è a Palermo, in Via Leonardo da Vinci, 111 - tel- 091.6820331 -

Vedi le indicazioni stradali e la Mappa

Lo Studio PSIMED - Psicologia Medica Psicosomatica - eroga PSICOTERAPIA (individuale, di coppia, in gruppo), e MEDICINA SPECIALISTICA (neurologia, psichiatria, endocrinologia, dietologia, ginecologia, sessuologia). Queste specialistiche sono applicate ai "Disturbi e Disagi Psicologici", ad esempio (ansia, panico, fobie, depressione, disturbi dell'umore, disturbi di personalità, disturbi del comportamento alimentare, disturbi e malattie psicosomatiche, disturbi sessuali psicogeni maschili e femminili, disturbi da dipendenza, parafilie e perversioni sessuali, malattie psichiatriche).

Con le nostre metodologie specialistiche e specifiche, ci occupiamo, inoltre, della Consulenza e della Psicoterapia di Coppia e delle Problematiche Sessuali nella Coppia e nel Matrimonio.

Ф

INFORMAZIONI SUI COSTI DELLA PSICOTERAPIA

Ci viene spesso richiesto se il "primo colloquio" con lo psicoterapeuta è gratuito.

Informiamo che:

  •  il primo colloquio con lo Psicoterapeuta è già una prestazione specialistica clinica e psicodiagnostica e come tale va remunerata.

  •  il livello di specializzazione, qualificazione, esperienza trentennale ed anzianità professionale degli psicologi, degli  psicoterapeuti e degli altri specialisti, non consente, nel nostro Studio, a differenza di come avviene altrove, di rendere disponibile il primo colloquio gratuitamente.

  •  tuttavia, negli ultimi anni abbiamo molto contenuto le nostre tariffe e rendiamo disponibili sia un Tariffario Agevolato e sia una offerta di "Psicoterapia Convenzionata".

Ф

 

Cause dei disturbi

Diagnosi dei disturbi

Terapia dei disturbi

Disturbi d'Ansia e Panico

Depressione

Anoressia e Bulimia

Disturbi di Personalità

Disturbi del sonno

Disturbi sessuali

Disturbi Psicosomatici

Disturbi da Dipendenze

Terapia di Coppia

Cultura e Società

Psicologia Medica

 
 


skipped

Famiglia e matrimonio: tradizione e innovazione

Sono in atto nella società moderna, da diversi decenni ormai, processi di cambiamento nell'area dell'organizzazione dell'aggruppamento umano.

Il fatto di consociarsi, è per l'essere umano, un comportamento al servizio di istinti, pulsioni e bisogni. L'associazione specializzata fra umani, è ciò che noi chiamiamo "famiglia".

Nella cultura occidentale ad impronta cattolica, la denominazione di famiglia si riferisce automaticamente soltanto all'unione fra un uomo e una donna e i loro figli, più i parenti più stretti.

Tuttavia la famiglia, nel suo significato fondamentale, è una qualunque associazione fra umani, fondata su sentimenti ed intenzioni di aiuto reciproco, solidale, amorevole e strutturata nel rispetto di un progetto condiviso. Questa tipologia di associazione umana soddisfa alcuni dei bisogni fondamentali dell'essere umano ed esorcizza alcune paure fondamentali. Tuttavia soltanto l'associazione fra sessi diversi può soddisfare anche l'istinto sessuale con modalità ordinate e l'istinto ed il bisogno di procreazione. Di conseguenza una famiglia esaustiva, cioè completa per soddisfare tutti questi istinti e bisogni, non può che essere a composizione eterosessuale. Nel tempo la struttura di questa associazione eterosessuale, specialmente in seno alla cultura cattolica, ha finito per assumere, nel mondo occidentale cattolico, quasi esclusivamente la forma monogama.

Nonostante ciò gli esseri umani non hanno mai smesso di teorizzare e tentare di praticare strutture e forme di associazione diverse da quelle più tradizionali, restando la famiglia una necessità inderogabile richiesta dalla Natura Umana, prima ancora che da qualsiasi teoria e cultura.

Vedi Bibliografia


Seguono alcuni esempi, notizie ed articoli sul tema della diversità nelle associazioni umane:

  1. Matrimonio bigamo (inglese)
  2. Relazioni poliamorose
  3. Polyamory - What it is and what it isn't (inglese)
  4. Relazioni poligame (inglese)
  5. Comunità Zegg

 

§

 

First Trio "Married" in The Netherlands

From the desk of Paul Belien on Tue, 2005-09-27 00:08
bigamie.jpg

The Netherlands and Belgium were the first countries to give full marriage rights to homosexuals. In the United States some politicians propose “civil unions” that give homosexual couples the full benefits and responsibilities of marriage. These civil unions differ from marriage only in name.

Meanwhile in the Netherlands polygamy has been legalised in all but name. Last Friday the first civil union of three partners was registered. Victor de Bruijn (46) from Roosendaal “married” both Bianca (31) and Mirjam (35) in a ceremony before a notary who duly registered their civil union.

“I love both Bianca and Mirjam, so I am marrying them both,” Victor said. He had previously been married to Bianca. Two and a half years ago they met Mirjam Geven through an internet chatbox. Eight weeks later Mirjam deserted her husband and came to live with Victor and Bianca. After Mirjam’s divorce the threesome decided to marry.

Victor: “A marriage between three persons is not possible in the Netherlands, but a civil union is. We went to the notary in our marriage costume and exchanged rings. We consider this to be just an ordinary marriage.”

Asked by journalists to tell the secret of their peculiar relationship, Victor explained that there is no jealousy between them. “But this is because Mirjam and Bianca are bisexual. I think that with two heterosexual women it would be more difficult.” Victor stressed, however, that he is “a one hundred per cent heterosexual” and that a fourth person will not be allowed into the “marriage.” They want to take their marriage obligations seriously: “to be honest and open with each other and not philander.”

Update:

Dutch Minister Not to Prevent Polygamy 1 November 2005 

The War against Marriage and Men 19 December 2005

 

§

 

Poliamore                             

Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera.

Link: Associazione Mondiale Poliamore

 

 

Il termine poliamore è un neologismo che esprime il concetto di «amori multipli». L'ideale di una relazione poliamorosa è quella di avere una relazione sentimentale e/o sessuale onesta con più partner nello stesso periodo.

Il termine è stato coniato indipendentemente da più persone, tra cui Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart che introdusse il termine «relazione poliamorosa» nel suo articolo A Bouquet of Lovers nel 1990, e Jennifer Wesp che creò su Usenet il newsgroup alt.polyamory nel 1992. Tuttavia occorrenze del termine sono state reperite già a partire dagli anni sessanta, e le relazioni poliamorose sono ovviamente esistite da ben prima che il termine venisse creato.

L'inizio della manifestazione in favore del poliamore svoltasi a San Francisco nel 2004

Indice

  • 1 Tipologie di poliamore
  • 2 Riconoscimenti legali delle relazioni poliamorose
  • 3 I valori del poliamore
    • 3.1 Onestà e rispetto
    • 3.2 Dialogo e consenso
    • 3.3 Non possesso
  • 4 Il poliamore e l'essere genitori
    • 4.1 Legislazioni sull'affidamento dei figli
  • 5 Critiche al poliamore
    • 5.1 Divisione dell'amore
    • 5.2 Paura o incapacità di impegnarsi
    • 5.3 Tasso percepito di fallimento
    • 5.4 Obiezioni religiose
    • 5.5 Repliche alle critiche
  • 6 Celebrità poliamorose
  • 7 Voci correlate
  • 8 Altri progetti
  • 9 Collegamenti esterni

 Tipologie di poliamore

Le tipologie di relazioni poliamorose comprendono:

  • La polifedeltà, in cui le relazioni sentimentali e sessuali sono ristrette ad un particolare gruppo di partners.
  • Le relazioni secondarie, in cui sono presenti tipi di relazioni diverse, quelle primarie e quelle secondarie appunto. Esempi sono il matrimonio aperto e la coppia aperta.
  • La poligamia (ovvero poliginia, poliandria e loro combinazioni), in cui una persona sposa più coniugi (che possono eventualmente avere a loro volta altre relazioni poliamorose)
  • La relazione di gruppo o il matrimonio di gruppo, in cui tutti i membri di un gruppo si considerano ugualmente legati gli uni agli altri. Il concetto è illustrato da Robert A. Heinlein nel romanzo Straniero in terra straniera (Stranger in a Strange Land), e da Robert Rimmer.
  • Reti di relazioni in cui una particolare persona può avere relazioni di vari gradi di importanza con diverse persone, tutte d'accordo sull'«amicizia senza frontiere».
  • Relazioni in cui un partner è monogamo ma accetta che l'altro abbia altre relazioni.

Alcune persone, pur intrattenendo una relazione sessuale strettamente monogama, possono autodefinirsi poliamorose qualora si sentano emotivamente legate a più persone (amore platonico).

 

 Riconoscimenti legali delle relazioni poliamorose

Pochi paesi consentono matrimoni di stato tra tre o più partner. Tra i paesi che fanno eccezione c'è l'Olanda, che permette unioni civili tra più persone, e che ha celabrato la prima unione nazionale fra tre partner nel settembre 2005. [1]

 I valori del poliamore

Diversamente dal caso generale dello scambismo, le relazioni poliamorose includono un legame sentimentale; tuttavia il dibattito su quali siano le distinzioni tra lo scambismo e il poliamore è ancora aperto.

 Onestà e rispetto

La maggior parte dei monogami definisce la fedeltà come l'impegno di esclusività sessuale verso un unico partner (alla volta). Invece, la maggior parte dei poliamorosi definisce la fedeltà come l'onestà e l'apertura verso i propri partner, ed il mantenere gli impegni presi con essi.

La maggior parte dei poliamorosi pone l'accento sul rispetto verso tutti i partner. L'evitare di dare certe informazioni, anche in base ad un accordo del tipo "niente domande, niente racconti", è solitamente mal visto, poiché indica che i partner non si sentono in grado di gestire la verità; i partner del proprio partner dovrebbero infatti essere accettati e non solamente tollerati.

 Il poliamore e l'essere genitori

Come per gli altri aspetti del poliamore, le possibilità sul modo in cui i figli vengono integrati all'interno della struttura familiare varia considerevolmente:

  • I genitori sono i principali responsabili dei propri figli (biologici, adottivi o figliastri), ma le persone che hanno una relazione poliamorosa coi genitori contribuiscono a crescerli, agendo come una famiglia estesa.
  • Nei casi in cui le relazioni poliamorose sono ristrette all'interno di un gruppo, tutti i membri adulti del gruppo si occupano della crescita dei figli in modo collettivo, tutti con pari responsabilità a prescindere dai legami di consanguineità.
  • Una forma intermedia rispetto alle due precedenti prevede che i figli vedano i partner dei loro genitori come genitori adottivi.
  • La responsabilità della crescita dei figli ricade interamente sui genitori, mentre le persone con cui essi sono in relazioni poliamorose sono visti dai figli solo come amici dei loro genitori.

Nella scelta tra queste forme di relazione la durata del rapporto coi genitori gioca un ruolo fondamentale; infatti un adulto che sia stato partner del genitore per tutta la vita del figlio avrà con esso un "legame genitoriale" più forte rispetto ad un nuovo partner. Questo aspetto è presente anche nei casi di genitori adottivi in famiglie monogame.
Altri fattori che possono avere un'influenza significativa nel legame tra i propri figli e i propri partner sono l'eventuale convivenza, il numero delle relazioni, e la consapevolezza che i figli hanno della tipologia delle relazioni dei loro genitori.

§

 

Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, Volume 6, Feb. 27, 2003

www.ejhs.org

Polyamory - What it is and what it isn't.
by
Derek McCullough
and
David S. Hall, Ph.D.

"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail"
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Polyamory - What it is..

"Your love is located within you. It is yours to nurture and savor, to give to others in any way you choose. Love must be without qualifications or demands. You must learn to find ecstasy in other peoples happiness. Once you feel love for yourself, it is quite normal to give it away." Wayne Dyer Gifts from Eykis

Polyamory has been defined as the philosophy and practice of loving more than one person at a time with honesty and integrity. Synonyms for polyamory are responsible, ethical, and intentional, non-monogamy. Because those descriptions are somewhat clumsy, the term Polyamory was coined in the late 80's by a pagan Priestess, Morning Glory Zell, and defines a range of different lifestyle alternatives. In most cases, but not all, this involves some sexual or at least intensely intimate sensual behavior.

There have been various polyamorous communities and communes, perhaps the most famous being the Onieda Community in New York State in the mid-1800's, but generally they are isolated and keep their heads down, given the prevailing moral climate.

What do Polyamorists, in general, say they believe?

Polyamorists say that their philosophy is nothing more than a straightforward acceptance and celebration of the realities of human nature.

Polyamorists say that sex is not the enemy, that the real enemy is the deceit and betrayal of trust that results from trying to shoehorn our natural selves into a rigid, unnatural social system.

Polyamorists say that sex is a positive force if applied with honesty, responsibility and trust.

Polyamorists do not have to individually meet every need of each partner; they have help. If your wife loves opera and you dislike it, maybe one of her lovers will enjoy taking her to hear it. If he is also a computer whiz, and helps fix your computers when they don't behave, you are a very lucky person.

Polyamorists say that love is an infinite, not a finite commodity. An example of this is with children. When my oldest daughter was born, I loved her with every ounce of my being. When my son was born, I found that I didn't have to give them half a love each, I could love them both fully. My third child is loved as much, if not more, than the other two.

This also applies to friends - when you meet someone new, you don't have to think about who you are going to drop off to make them fit. As a woman said when explaining why she chose polyamory - "I refuse to accept the myth that I have to stop loving one person before I start loving another."

Polyamorists say that loving someone does not give you the right to control that person's behavior.

Polyamorists say that jealousy is not innate, inevitable and impossible to overcome. But they deal with jealousy often, usually successfully. There is a new term for the opposite of jealousy. "Compersion" is the feeling of joy that comes from knowing that the one you love is well loved by someone else.

Polyamorists say that love should be unconditional, rather than the monogamous proposition that "I will love you on the condition that you will not love anyone else" - "forsaking all others" is how it usually is put. And as shown by history, monogamy and marriage are no safeguards against falling in love with someone else.

Polyamorists believe in long term emotional investment in relationships, and while the goal is not always achieved in poly, it is also not always achieved in monogamy.

Polyamorists believe they represent true "family values". They have the courage to live an alternative lifestyle that, while condemned by society, is satisfying and rewarding. Children having multiple parents are more likely to be better cared for, and less likely to feel abandoned if someone leaves the family.

The Contrast with Monogamy

One of the nearly universally accepted assumptions in our society is the assumption that the monogamous pair is the only valid structure of human sexual relationships, being so superior that it doesn't warrant scrutiny. In fact, our culture puts so much emphasis on it, through cultural norms, modern literature and films, that serious discussion on the subject of alternatives is rare. Monogamous marriage has even been incorporated into the law of our land in the section that specifies how money for sex education must be spent. It is a focus of the religious right when they talk about how to reduce welfare, how to reduce abortion, how to reduce single parent families, and many other issues.

The reasons given for monogamous marriage being the only acceptable form of couple relating, and the only place where sex is allowed, generally fall into two categories.

1. It is our natural state (i.e., hard-wired)

2. It is the only moral state, the one approved by God - all other options are inherently sinful.

It is interesting to note that these are essentially the same reasons given by the fundamentalist right for their condemnation of homosexuality, namely that it is unnatural and immoral, and explains the affinity of polyamorists to the GLBT community. There is an excellent Beacon Press book by E. J. Graff, "What is Marriage For". Graff's six reasons for marriage are: money, sex, babies, kin, order and heart. She provides an excellent historical review of marriage and convincing evidence that our view of marriage is a very culturally determined one, and not a "natural" condition of the human organism.

If intelligent life is about the free and responsible search for truth and meaning then it is apparent that unquestioned answers are more dangerous than unanswered questions. Therefore, questioning monogamous marriage might be thought of as obligatory. Are we hard wired for it? Is it the only "moral" way of relating sexually to others?

It's only Natural.

"The complexity of a system is limited only if the system is rigid, inflexible and isolated from its environment. Self-organizing systems in continual interaction with their environment are capable of tremendously increasing their complexity by abandoning structural stability in favor of flexibility and open ended evolution."
Erich Jantsch. Design for Living.

In examining the natural structure of things, the binary system doesn't really stand out. The atomic structure has three parts; proton, electron, and neutron. These then combine to produce a complex array of atoms and thence molecules. Architectural structures generally, from the pyramids through to the geodesic domes of Buckminster Fuller, are based on the triangle. In music, a three-note chord is more dynamic and powerful than one made up of two notes. I know these are not persuasive arguments, but the triad is also a very common poly arrangement.

The increasing evidence from animal research is that fewer and fewer species (once thought to be so) are really monogamous in the wild. In the animal kingdom, less than 5% of all animals are now thought to be monogamous.

The evolutionary biologists posit that there are many good reasons for nonmonogamy, but their theories are difficult, if not impossible, to test. The anthropology argument for monogamy, that a man would only protect his children if he was sure of their paternity, is being questioned, most recently in a book called "Cultures of Multiple Fathers". In this study, the authors found evidence that showed that the children of women who had sexual relationships with many men had better survival rates - because of "potential" paternity, they were less vulnerable.

Of the 1270 human societies catalogued in Murdoch's Ethnographic Atlas, about 85% indicate some form of multi-spouse relationships. Even the few societies that theoretically espouse monogamy, like ours, have trouble showing any evidence that it works. On the contrary, there seems to be a lot of evidence that Western humans don't do monogamy well in the high divorce rates, high rates of infidelity, the highest teen pregnancy rate in the western world, high single parent family numbers, and other indicators. We often see people leave an otherwise good marriage because they fell in love with someone new, in what might be called serial monogamy. In short, the argument that the human animal is "hard wired" for monogamy is difficult to support.

In any case, since we humans are so bad at monogamy, other freely chosen relationship structures should also be supported.

It is sinful - God doesn't like it.

"Wickedness is a myth invented by good people to account for the curious attractiveness of others." Oscar Wilde Chameleon.

"Confusing monogamy with morality has done more to destroy the conscience of the human race than any other error." George Bernard Shaw

The sinfulness and wickedness of sex is based on the assumption that God doesn't like sex. This poison has its roots in Ancient Assyria, and the religions of Mythra and Zoroastrianism, which first put forth the idea of "the obscenity of the flesh." The sex drive, being one that cannot be denied, becomes a rich source of implanted guilt and shame, used to manipulate and degrade the individual. Therefore any sexual (natural) feelings need to be accompanied by shame, and therefore kept secret.

Somehow this shameful, sinful act is transformed into sacred overnight if accompanied by the right words by someone with the appropriate qualifications to marry people. It does not seem to matter how the marriage was arranged, for what reasons the people are marrying, or even if they want to be married. The only requirement is that they go through the legal process.

Without going into it too deeply, a perusal of most mainstream religions show that

1. Many of the ancient texts were written by polygamists, and

2. Most of the rules were based on considering women as property, rather than as a result of a solemn promise between equals.

It is also worth noting that no matter how strict the moral teachings, or how severe the punishments, be it from the Taliban, the Bible belt, Rome or Washington, human beings persist in trying to satisfy their sexual desires. A recent news article reported that 40% of nuns had a history of being sexually abused, either before or within the Roman church. The data on priests is slowly becoming public. The data on the general public is harder to obtain, given the resistance to admit to being abused, or being an abuser. It is clear that sex crimes put a lot of people in jail.

There is historical evidence of religions that embrace our sexual nature in a positive way, found on temple carvings from Asia, pottery from Europe and elsewhere, but it is not a feature of current Western mainstream religious practice.

Serial monogamy is perhaps an unconscious compromise between the cultural ideal of monogamy and the facts of human nature - in other words, we acknowledge that you can love more than one person, but only one at a time. The destructive effects of serial monogamy on children are well documented, with 8 million single parent families in the US, infidelity-fueled acrimonious divorces, through to the spate of spouse murdering lately. Much of the evidence seems to indicate that human attainment of the cultural ideal of monogamy is a myth.

The moral argument for monogamy is a weak position. A better moral argument can be made regarding what is best for each individual and for society, that is, do we make life better for each and all by insisting on sex only in monogamous marriage of heterosexual couples, or on letting individuals find responsible ways of relating that, in Pagan terms, "harm none". Liberal religion has taken a fine stance supporting homosexual and heterosexual couples, and unmarried couples as well. What is so hard about seeing the parallels to the "more than a couple" part?

It is a reality that there are many people now relating sexually in groups greater than two. The reason I keep referring to "relating sexually" is that this seems to be the stumbling block for many. If polyamorists were to keep it platonic, not be sexually involved with people they love in numbers greater than one, most would applaud their loving behavior. But when they admit that they not only love more than one, but have sexual relationships with more than one, all the red flags come flying out.

If you watch TV at all, you will know that polyamory is getting a lot of play, from episodes on Ally McBeal, talk shows like Montel Williams, John Walsh, Geraldo, and HBO's Real Sex. There are many poly friendly films available from Hollywood, and of course the Really Rich and Famous can do what they please about relationships and get lots of favorable press. What has brought polys out of the closet is the Internet, where people who thought they were the "only ones" find lots of company.

Polyamory - What it isn't..

"Current sexual practice can no longer be explained by the old theories and we do not yet understand it in the light of new ones. Racing ahead of history, we now find ourselves in a new territory." June Singer The Energies of Love.

Polyamory as it is defined is frequently misunderstood. Polyamory is not "The Answer". If you are looking for a quick fix for relationship problems, don't look to polyamory. It is a choice, as is monogamy, that needs to be taken responsibly, and brings with it as many, if not more, challenges. It is definitely not a fix for a bad marriage or other relationship problems.

The most widespread misunderstanding is with swinging. Swinging is essentially recreational sex, also known as wife swapping ( though curiously not husband swapping). Research has shown that swingers are largely indistinguishable from the rest of the population except that they are people who would rather have sex than play bridge on Saturday night.

Swinging does share a lot in common with polyamory in that it is nonmonogamous, intentional and responsible. Both lifestyles share the idea that sex is a positive, pleasurable and natural part of being human, and not a synonym for love. The main difference is that swinging focuses on casual sex and tends to prohibit other intimacy, whereas polyamory is more concerned with enduring intimate relationships that include sex. There is however some crossover, with people arriving at one via the other and vice versa. Unfortunately, in our society obsessed with promoting the cultural myth of monogamy, the salacious aspects of swinging are often used to reputationally smear both swingers and polyamorists. Examples include the Wyoming politician who withdrew his candidacy in the 2002 election when his lifestyle was exposed, the attempt in 2002 to disqualify Jack McGeorge as a UN weapons inspector in Iraq because he teaches S&M and espouses sexual freedom, and the effort to blame the parents in the 2001 child killing in San Diego because they were swingers. Many polys wished Bill Clinton had said he loved Hillary and Monica, and that Hillary was supportive of that relationship, but it looked more like cheating than loving.

Swinging and polyamory are not "free love" in the 60's sense of the term. (This seems to be one of the objections of those who survived, or were wounded, in the sixties.) In a lot of cases, free love in the 60's was a response to the enormous freeing up of taboos against sex that occurred at that time, and often was not accompanied by honesty or responsibility, but used as an excuse to have a lot of sex. It was frequently grouped together with drugs, (as in the mantra of "sex, drugs and rock-n-roll") which allowed it to be discounted as "a phase," facilitating a return to the "traditional" values that were reestablished in the 80's and 90's.

The challenges besetting the putative polyamorist are:

Sex.

"If W.H.Auden is correct when he observes that 'As a rule it was only the pleasure haters who became unjust', then only a civilization that fosters erotic celebration can usher in a new era of justice-making" Matthew Fox Original Blessing.

This is the bit that trips most people up. When you cite the example of infinite love regarding children, people can understand the concept, but somehow sexual love between consenting adults is seen as different. We confuse sex and love too easily, often employing sex to do the work of love and love to do the work of sex. For a long time adultery was the only grounds for divorce, yet in reality, it was the deceit and betrayal that were the problems, not the sex itself.

As the Chinese proverb says "The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name." Understanding the difference between sex, love and intimacy will go a long way to solving relationship problems.

The more we study sex, which has only been done scientifically in the last century, the more we realize how complex, variable and universal it is. As pointed out earlier, enjoyment of sex was considered evil, particularly in women (witches). Then, after Freud, it was often considered a sickness. For many years, nymphomania was considered a disease of women who liked sex. (See Groneman.)

To top it off, sex has become politically incorrect, attacked from both the left, the radical feminists who equate sex with the degradation of women, and the right - well, we should all know about their attacks on comprehensive sex education and medically correct sexual health information.

Either way, sex is seen as sinful, sleazy and best kept private. And the ACLU help us if we have any visual depictions of sex. Of course, violence is entertaining for the public, only sex is rated X.

We have become crippled by our fear of sex, allowing it to become a trigger for all kinds of hysteria. Think of the knee-jerk reaction to the term "Internet porn". Several recent books focus on this hysteria born of sexual fear, including Lynley Hood's outstanding book "A City Possessed" and Judith Levine's "Harmful to Minors - The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex", a volume that provoked substantial hysteria of its own when published recently. And yet, despite all the dire warnings, we find that humans continue to explore their sexuality in a rainbow of ways - the sex drive will not be denied. Tom Robbins, in "Fierce Invalids Home From Hot Climates", cites erotic celebration, as opposed to mindless procreation, as one of the six things that make us different from the rest of the animal kingdom.

So sex is not the enemy. When accepted with honesty and responsibility, it could well become part of the solution, as Fox outlines in the quote above.

Jealousy.

"The only way out of jealousy is through it. We may have to let jealousy have its way with us and do its job of reorienting fundamental values. Its pain comes, at least in part, from opening up to unexplored territory and letting go of old familiar truths in the face of unknown and threatening possibilities." Thomas Moore Care of the Soul.

This is the other big myth - that jealousy is innate, inevitable and impossible to overcome. Indeed, showing jealousy is even taken as proof of love, and is used a valid excuse for violent and aggressive behavior. Until recently, catching your wife in bed with a lover was a defense for murder in some places. Jealousy, possessiveness and control are also at the core of domestic violence, which thrives in the privacy of monogamy.

Our culture seems addicted to three core beliefs about relationships that are almost guaranteed to create jealousy in even the most well adjusted people. Identifying and dismantling these beliefs is the most effective way of dealing with jealousy.

Core belief #1

If my partner really loved me, there would not be any desire for an intimate or sexual relationship with anyone else.

This is based on the scarcity model of love, in which a partner's emotional or love interest in somebody else means that I will be loved less. It is as absurd as the idea that to have a second child is an indication that you don't love your first child enough. It also presumes that sex and love are the same thing and meet the same needs.

Core belief #2.

If I were a good partner/spouse/lover, my partner would be so satisfied that they wouldn't want to get involved with anybody else.

This belief is even more insidious. With the first belief you can at least blame the problem on your partner. This belief makes it your fault for not being the perfect lover. This is also the basis of the widespread romantic myth of the "one and only person on the planet". This is also guaranteed to cause serious self-esteem problems, which is fertile ground for jealousy.

Core belief #3.

It is just not possible to love more than one person at a time.

This again is based on the scarcity theory of love, that I only have a finite amount to give.

All of these beliefs are connected to a primal fear of loss and abandonment, however unfounded. Neale Donald Walsche, in his series "Conversations with God" described fear as "False Evidence Appearing Real". I prefer "Fantasy Existing As Reality", in other words, we imagine the worst possible outcomes and then believe that these are our "real" feelings.

Polyamorists replace these core beliefs with three new core beliefs.

New Core Belief #1

My partner loves me and trusts me so much that we can allow our relationship to expand and be enriched by experiencing even more love from others. There is an abundance of love in the world and there is plenty for everyone. Loving more than one person is a choice that can exponentially expand the potential for giving and receiving love.

New Core Belief #2.

My partner is so confident in me and our relationship that having other partners will not create jealousy that will destroy our love.

New Core Belief #3

Whatever socially unusual arrangements we have set up in our love lives, they have been agreed to consciously and responsibly by everyone involved. We insist on integrity in our relationships.

Once you can get away from the "either/or" polarity, and accept an "and/both" approach, or as some Polys say, having your Kate and Edith too, many of the accompanying demons associated with jealousy will disappear.

Practicalities.

"Eccentricity has always abounded where and when strength of character has abounded: and the amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigor and moral courage it contained. That so few dare to be eccentric marks the chief danger of the time"   John Stuart Mill

We live in a culturally monogamous society, so to espouse polyamory certainly puts you in the eccentric category, "the lunatic fringe" so to speak. In the current political climate, this also brings with it dangers. This is illustrated in cases where children have been removed from their parents because they were not living in the mandated norm of mum, dad and the kids. To come out as poly is a vulnerable thing to do, given all the misunderstandings and all the sleazy, sinful innuendo. It is also the reason why poly people relate to the gay and lesbian community, who have been through, and in many cases still are going through, the same process. Polyamorists are certainly viewed by the societal majority with the utmost suspicion.

Polyamorists also fully support the right of anyone to select monogamy as a life choice, and believe it is the right choice for many people. The key here is choice.

"It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong."
Voltaire

Given all the hassle, why bother to be polyamorous? It is certainly not to be able to have more sex. If that is what you are after, you will probably have much more success operating under the widely accepted model of "It is OK if nobody knows." To be open is to be too weird for most people.

But to realize that you are polyamorous in a monogamous world can often mean going through life with the sense that you are harboring a dirty little secret. It can cause isolation, alienation and an inability to be intimate with people - you are hiding a core part of yourself.

For Polyamorists, the rewards are simple. One of the best gifts you can give yourself is the permission to be yourself. By loving yourself unconditionally, and respecting all your qualities and inclinations, you allow yourself to be at peace. This becomes part of a larger process of self-differentiation - of determining who you are and what is important to you. To live as a poly requires the same value base as living morally, ethically, honestly and responsibly.

Questions for you to answer.

"A free and responsible search for truth and meaning" Unitarian Universalist affirmation.

If my partners' happiness is important to me, why should I get upset if others can make them happy? What is more important, my partners' happiness or who gets the credit?

If I find my partner attractive, sexy, and lovely and desirable, why should I feel surprised and threatened when someone else does? In fact, should it not give us something more in common - a shared interest? (In the same way that we like the teachers who like our children.)

If monogamy is so natural and hardwired, why is there such a large relationship industry - the "How to make it right" of magazines, books, TV shows, marriage guidance, etc.?

Acknowledgement:
This started as a Sunday message by Derek McCullough, a UU from NZ. It evolved into a presentation to other UU folks, and finally to this article. Thanks to the Journal editors who carefully reviewed and edited this work.

Revised 2/23/05

References:

http://www.uupa.org/
http://www.lovemore.com/
http://www.lovethatworks.org/
http://www.lovewithoutlimits.com/

http://www.worldpolyamoryassociation.org/index.html

 

Anapol, D. "Polyamory: The new love without limits"
     Available through Loving More, POB 4358, Boulder, CO 80306

Beckerman, S. and Valentine, P. (Eds.) "Cultures with Multiple Fathers"  U. Florida Press, 2002

Foster, B., Foster, M., and Hadady, L. "Three in Love"  Harper Collins, 1997

Francoeur, R., Cornog, M., and Pepper, T. (Eds.) "Sex, Love and Marriage in the 21st Century: The next sexual revolution"  To Excell Press, 1999

Graff, E. J. "What is Marriage For?"  Beacon Press, 1999

Groneman, C. "Nymphomania"  W. W. Norton, 2000

Hood, L. "A City Possessed - The Christchurch Civic Creche Case" Longacre Press, 2001

Lano & Parry (Eds.) "Breaking the Barriers to Desire: New approaches to multiple relationships"  Five Leaves Publications, Nottingham, 1995

Levine, J. "Harmful to Minors - The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex"  U. Minn. Press, 2002

Lizst, C. and Easton, D. "The Ethical Slut: A guide to infinite sexual possibilities"  Greenery Press, 1997

"Loving More" magazine, a quarterly publication for the polyamory community.
     Available through Loving More, POB 4358, Boulder, CO 80306

Mazur, R. "The New Intimacy"  To Excell Press, 1973, 2000

Murdock, G. P. "Ethnographic Atlas"  World Culture, Vol. 2-4, 1986

Nearing, R. "The New Faithful: A Polyfidelity Primer"  Polyfidelity Educational Productions
     Available through Loving More, POB 4358, Boulder, CO 80306

 

Polygamy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 
In botany, "polygamous" means bearing both hermaphrodite and unisexual flowers on the same plant. See plant sexuality

The term polygamy (a Greek word meaning "the practice of multiple marriage") is used in related ways in social anthropology, sociobiology, and sociology. Polygamy can be defined as any "form of marriage in which a person [has] more than one spouse."[1]

In social anthropology, polygamy is the practice of marriage to more than one spouse simultaneously. Historically, polygamy has been practiced as polygyny (one man having more than one wife), or as polyandry (one woman having more than one husband), or, less commonly as group marriage (husbands having many wives and those wives having many husbands). (See "Forms of Polygamy" below.) In contrast, monogamy is the practice of each person having only one spouse. Like monogamy, the term is often used in a de facto sense, applying regardless of whether the relationships are recognized by the state (see marriage for a discussion on the extent to which states can and do recognize potentially and actually polygamous forms as valid). In sociobiology, polygamy is used in a broad sense to mean any form of multiple mating. In a narrower sense, used by zoologists, polygamy includes a pair bond, perhaps temporary.

Contents

  • 1 Forms of polygamy
    • 1.1 Polygyny
    • 1.2 Polyandry
    • 1.3 Group marriage
    • 1.4 Bigamy
    • 1.5 Serial monogamy
    • 1.6 Other forms of nonmonogamy
  • 2 Patterns of occurrence worldwide
  • 3 Africa
    • 3.1 South Africa
    • 3.2 Sudan
  • 4 Asia
    • 4.1 South Asia
    • 4.2 Mongolia
    • 4.3 Thailand
    • 4.4 China
    • 4.5 Hong Kong
  • 5 Patterns of occurrence across religions
    • 5.1 Buddhism
    • 5.2 Hinduism
    • 5.3 Judaism
      • 5.3.1 Biblical practice
      • 5.3.2 Modern practice
    • 5.4 Christianity
    • 5.5 Mormonism
    • 5.6 Islam
  • 6 Legal situation
    • 6.1 By country
  • 7 Current proponents and opponents
    • 7.1 Secular
    • 7.2 Religious
  • 8 Polygamy in fiction and popular culture
    • 8.1 Science fiction, utopias, dystopias
    • 8.2 Prehistoric and historic fiction
    • 8.3 Contemporary settings
  • 9 See also
  • 10 References
  • 11 Bibliography
  • 12 External links

 Forms of polygamy

Polygamy exists in three specific forms, including polygyny (one man having multiple wives), polyandry (one woman having multiple husbands), or group marriage (some combination of polygyny and polyandry). Historically, all three practices have been found, but polygyny is by far the most common.[2] Confusion arises when the broad term "polygamy" is used when a narrower definition is intended.

 Polygyny

Polygyny is the situation in which one man is either married to or involved in sexual relationships with a number of different women at one time. This is the most common form of polygamy. This was the most common form of polygamy practiced by Mormons in the 19th century, and practiced today by self-identified fundamentalist offshoots.

 Polyandry

Polyandry is a practice where a woman is married to more than one man at the same time. Fraternal polyandry was traditionally practiced among nomadic Tibetans in Nepal and parts of China, in which two or more brothers share the same wife, with her having equal sexual access to them. Polyandry is believed to be more likely in societies with scarce environmental resources, as it is believed to limit human population growth and enhance child survival. A woman can only have so many children in her lifetime, no matter how many husbands she has. On the other hand, a child with many "fathers", all of whom provide resources, is more likely to survive. (In contrast, the number of children would be increased if polygyny were practiced, and a man had more than one wife. These wives could be simultaneously pregnant).[3] It is a rare form of marriage that exists not only among poor families, but also within the elite.[4]

 Group marriage

Group marriage, or circle marriage, may exist in a number of forms, such as where more than one man and more than one woman form a single family unit, and all members of the marriage share parental responsibility for any children arising from the marriage. Another possible arrangement not thought to exist in reality (on the social level), although occurring in science fiction (notably in Robert Heinlein'sThe Moon Is a Harsh Mistress), is the long-lived line marriage, in which deceased or departing spouses in the group are continually replaced by others, so that family property never becomes dispersed through inheritance.

 Bigamy

Bigamy is the act or condition of a person marrying another person while still being lawfully married to a third person. Bigamy is listed (and sometimes prosecuted) as a crime in most western countries. For example, in the United States, by law, a married person is obliged not to marry again as long as their first marriage continues.

 Serial monogamy

Main article: Serial monogamy

The phrase serial monogamy has been used to describe the lifestyle of persons who have repeatedly married and divorced multiple partners.

 Other forms of nonmonogamy

Main article: Forms of nonmonogamy

Other forms of nonmonogamous relationships are discussed at Forms of nonmonogamy. One modern variant is polyamory.

 Patterns of occurrence worldwide

According to the Ethnographic Atlas Codebook, of the 1231 societies noted, 186 were monogamous. 453 had occasional polygyny, 588 had more frequent polygyny, and 4 had polyandry.[2] At the same time, even within societies which allow polygyny, the actual practice of polygyny occurs relatively rarely. There are exceptions: in Senegal, for example, nearly 47 percent of marriages are multiple.[5] To take on more than one wife often requires considerable resources: this may put polygamy beyond the means of the vast majority of people within those societies. Such appears the case in many traditional Islamic societies, and in Imperial China. Within polygynous societies, multiple wives often become a status symbol denoting wealth and power. Similarly, within societies that formally prohibit polygamy, social opinion may look favorably on persons maintaining mistresses or engaging in serial monogamy.

Some observers[who?] detect a social preference for polygyny in disease-prone (especially tropical) climates, and speculate that (from a potential mother's viewpoint) perceived quality of paternal genes may favour the practice there.[citation needed] The countervailing situation allegedly prevails in harsher climates, where (once again from a potential mother's viewpoint) reliable paternal care as exhibited in monogamous pair-bonding outweighs the importance of paternal genes.[citation needed]

 Africa

Polygamy existed all over Africa as an aspect of culture or/and religion. Plural marriages have been more common than not in the history of Africa. Many African societies saw children as a form of wealth thus the more children a family had the more powerful it was. Thus polygamy was part of empire building. It was only during the colonial era that plural marriage was perceived as taboo. Esther Stanford, an African-focused lawyer, states that this decline was encouraged because the issues of property ownership conflicted with European colonial interest.[6] It is very common in West Africa (Muslim and traditionalist).

 South Africa

In South Africa, traditionalists commonly practice polygamy.[7] The leader of the ANC, Jacob Zuma is also openly in favor of plural marriages, being married to numerous wives himself.[8][9] The wives live in small houses in a circle around the master compound.[10]

 Sudan

Polygamy is encouraged in countries such as Sudan, where President Omar Hassan al-Bashir has encouraged multiple marriages to increase the population.[11]

 Asia

The Chinese culture of Confucianism and thus the practice of polygamy spread from China to the areas that are now Korea and Japan. Before the establishment of the modern democratic mode, Eastern countries permitted a similar practice of polygamy.[12]

 South Asia

Polygyny is illegal in India for Hindus under the Hindu marriage Act. It has disappeared completely in urban areas and among the cosmopolitan middle class among Hindus. It has, however, been reported in rural areas and among the lower classes of Hindus. Polygyny, permitted under Islamic law, is present amongst some Muslims in South Asia. Polygamy is considerably more widespread among Hindus in Nepal than in India.

 Mongolia

In Mongolia, there has been discussion about legalizing polygamy to reduce the imbalance of the male and female population.[13]

 Thailand

Until polygamy was outlawed by King Rama VI, it was expected that wealthy or upper-class Thai men were historically recognized to maintain mansions consisting of multiple wives and their children in the same residence. Among the royalty and courtiers in the past, wives were classified as principal, secondary, and slave. Today, the tradition of minor wives still remains, but the practice is different from that of the past. Due to the expense involved, minor wives are mostly limited to the wealthy men. While a "proper woman" (Kulasatrii; Thai: กุลสตรี) must remain faithful to her husband, there were no equivalent rules in history mandating fidelity in the "virtuous man."

Regardless of the historical acceptance, male polygamy or plural marriage is no longer legally or socially acceptable in the contemporary Thai society. However, the practice of having "minor wives" (Mia-Noi: เมียน้อย) continues in modern days in secrecy from the "primary wife" (Mia-Luang: เมียหลวง).[14] Almost all married Thai women today object to this practice, and indeed for many it has been grounds for divorce.[15] Minor wives are viewed with contempt by the Thai society along the lines of being amoral women or home breakers.[16]

 China

Since the Han Dynasty, technically, Chinese men could have only one wife. However, throughout the thousands of years of Chinese history, it was common for rich Chinese men to have a wife and various concubines. Polygamy is a by-product of the tradition of emphasis on procreation and the continuity of the father's family name.[citation needed] Before the establishment of the Republic of China, it was lawful to have a wife and multiple concubines within Chinese marriage. An emperor, government officials or rich merchants could have hundreds of concubines after marrying his first wife. After the Communist Revolution in 1949, polygamy was banned via the Marriage Act of 1953.

 Hong Kong

In Hong Kong, polygamy was banned in October 1971. [17] Some Hong Kong businessmen[who?] have concubines across the border in mainland China, but concubines do not have the legal or social status of wives and so this should not strictly be called "polygamy". Kevin Murphy of The International Herald Tribune[18] reports the cross-border polygyny phenomenon in Hong Kong in 1995.[19]

The traditional attitude toward mistresses is reflected in the saying: "wife is not as good as concubine, concubine is not as good as prostitute, prostitute is not as good as secret affair, secret affair is not as good as the affair you want but can't get" (妻不如妾, 妾不如妓, 妓不如偷, 偷不如偷不到).[citation needed]

 Patterns of occurrence across religions

 

 Buddhism

Marriage is considered a secular issue in Buddhism. According to Theravada Buddhism, polygamy is discouraged and extramatrial affairs are considered sinful. It is said in the Parabhava Sutta that "a man who is not satisfied with one woman and seeks out other women is on the path to decline". In Tibetan Buddhism, namely Tibetan Vajrayana Buddhism, it is not uncommon to take a consort in addition to a spouse, though it is namely for certain spiritual practices that the spouse may not be able/ready to participate in—or if the husband/wife are at different levels on their spiritual path.[citation needed] A consort is appropriate in such cases. Within this context, either the husband or wife, occasionally both, might take a spiritual consort. This is known as Consort Practice, and there are specific teachings and meditations that go along with it. Consort Practice is often very private, however, and not openly discussed outside of followers of Tibetan Vajrayana—which tends to be a very private form of Buddhism in general – hence it is not very well known. Husbands and wives also engage in Consort Practice together, monogamously.

The 2008 BBC documentary series "A Year in Tibet", however, recorded three distinct cases of polyandry in and around the city of Gyantse alone (the pregnant farmer's wife in episode 1, "The Visit"; Yangdron in episode 2, "Three Husbands and a Wedding"; and the young monk, Tsephun's, mother in episode 5, "A Tale of Three Monks"). In "Three Husbands and a Wedding", a 17-year-old girl is also shown being forced into a marriage that would have been polyandrous, except that the younger, 12-year-old, brother had to attend school on the wedding day (his parents hint that he will marry his older brother's new wife at a later date). The programs include statements from the women involved that indicate they did not enter the polyandrous marriages willingly, and commentary that indicates young women in Tibet are routinely forced by their families into polyandrous marriages with two or more brothers.

Polyandry (especially fraternal polyandry) is also common among Buddhists in Bhutan, Ladakh, and other parts of the Indian subcontinent.

Hinduism

Both polygyny and polyandry were practiced in many sections of Hindu society in ancient times. Concerning polyandry, in the ancient Hindu epic, Mahabharata, Draupadi marries the five Pandava brothers. Regarding polygny, Ramayan, father of Ram, king Dasharath has three wives, but Ram has pledged himself just one wife. The god-figure Lord Krishna, the 9th incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu had 16,108 wives which were his most sincere devotees. Historically, kings routinely took concubines (such as the Vijaynagara emperor, Krishnadevaraya. In the post-Vedic periods, polygamy declined in Hinduism, and is now considered immoral [6], although it is thought that some sections of Hindu society still practice polyandry, along with areas of Tibet, Nepal, and China. After independence from the British, religions in which polygamy was still practiced were allowed to continue. Under the Hindu Marriage Act, polygamy is considered illegal for Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs [7]. However, Muslim men in India are allowed to have multiple wives. Marriage laws in India are dependent upon the religion of the subject in question.[20]

 Judaism

 Biblical practice

The Hebrew scriptures document approximately forty polygamists, including such figures as Abraham,[21] Jacob,[22] David and Solomon,[23] with little or no further remark on their polygamy as such.

In general, however, monogamy was considered the ideal state,[24] with multiple marriage a realistic alternative in the case of famine, widowhood, or female infertility.[25] One source of polygamy was the practice of levirate marriage, wherein a man was required to marry and support his deceased brother's widow, as mandated by Deuteronomy 25:5-10.

The Torah, Judaism's central text, includes a few specific regulations on the practice of polygamy, such as Exodus 21:10, which states that multiple marriages are not to diminish the status of the first wife (specifically, her right to food, clothing and conjugal relations). Deuteronomy 21:15-17, states that a man must award the inheritance due to a first-born son to the son who was actually born first, even if he hates that son's mother and likes another wife more; (though this is typically interpreted as referring to divorce),[26] and Deuteronomy 17:17 states that the king shall not have too many wives.[27] The king's behavior is condemned by Prophet Samuel in 1Samuel 8. Exodus 21:10 also speaks of Jewish concubines. Israeli lexicographer Vadim Cherny argues that the Torah carefully distinguishes concubines and "sub-standard" wives with prefix "to", lit. "took to wives."[28]

The monogamy of the Roman Empire was the cause of two explanatory notes in the writings of Josephus describing how the polygamous marriages of Herod were permitted under Jewish custom.[29]

 Modern practice

In the modern day, Rabbinic Judaism has essentially outlawed polygamy. Ashkenazi Jews have followed Rabbenu Gershom's ban since the 11th century.[30] Some Sephardi and Mizrahi Jews (particularly those from Yemen and Iran) discontinued polygamy much more recently, as they emigrated to countries where it was forbidden. The State of Israel has severely limited the ability for Jews to enter polygamous marriages,[31] but instituted provisions for existing polygamous families immigrating from countries where the practice was legal.

Among Karaite Jews, who do not adhere to Rabbinic interpretations of the Torah, polygamy is almost non-existent today. Like other Jews, Karaites interpret Leviticus 18:18 to mean that a man can only take a second wife if his first wife gives her consent (Keter Torah on Leviticus, pp.96—97) and Karaites interpret Exodus 21:10 to mean that a man can only take a second wife if he is capable of maintaining the same level of marital duties due to his first wife; the marital duties are 1) food, 2) clothing, and 3) sexual gratification. Because of these two biblical limitations and because nearly all countries outlaw it, polygamy is considered highly impractical, and there are only a few known cases of it among Karaite Jews today.

 Christianity

Saint Augustine saw a conflict with Old Testament polygamy. He writes in The Good of Marriage (chapter 15) that, although it "was lawful among the ancient fathers: whether it be lawful now also, I would not hastily pronounce. For there is not now necessity of begetting children, as there then was, when, even when wives bear children, it was allowed, in order to a more numerous posterity, to marry other wives in addition, which now is certainly not lawful." He refrained from judging the patriarchs, but did not deduce from their practice the ongoing acceptability of polygamy. In chapter 7, he wrote, "Now indeed in our time, and in keeping with Roman custom, it is no longer allowed to take another wife, so as to have more than one wife living." [emphasis added]

The New Testament authors seem to prefer monogamy from church leaders. Paul writes in 1Timothy 3:2, " A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;" Something similar is repeated in the first chapter of the book of Titus.

However, the Roman Catholic Church has subsequently taught on more fundamental grounds that "polygamy is not in accord with the moral law. [Conjugal] communion is radically contradicted by polygamy; this, in fact, directly negates the plan of God which was revealed from the beginning, because it is contrary to the equal personal dignity of men and women who in matrimony give themselves with a love that is total and therefore unique and exclusive." (Catholic Cathechism, para. 2387, Vatican website). This is also the normal position among Protestant Churches, and it can therefore be said that the mainstream Christian position is to reject polygamy in principle.

Periodically, Christian reform movements that have aimed at rebuilding Christian doctrine based on the Bible alone (sola scriptura) have at least temporarily accepted polygamy as a Biblical practice. For example, during the Protestant Reformation, in a document referred to simply as "Der Beichtrat" (or "The Confessional Advice" ),[32] Martin Luther granted the Landgrave Philip of Hesse, who, for many years, had been living "constantly in a state of adultery and fornication,"[33] a dispensation to take a second wife. The double marriage was to be done in secret however, to avoid public scandal.[34] Some fifteen years earlier, in a letter to the Saxon Chancellor Gregor Brück, Luther stated that he could not "forbid a person to marry several wives, for it does not contradict Scripture." ("Ego sane fateor, me non posse prohibere, si quis plures velit uxores ducere, nec repugnat sacris literis.")[35]

"On February 14, 1650, the parliament at Nürnberg decreed that, because so many men were killed during the Thirty Years’ War, the churches for the following ten years could not admit any man under the age of 60 into a monastery. Priests and ministers not bound by any monastery were allowed to marry. Lastly, the decree stated that every man was allowed to marry up to ten women. The men were admonished to behave honorably, provide for their wives properly, and prevent animosity among them."[36][37][38][39][40]

The modern trend towards frequent divorce and remarriage is sometimes referred to by conservative Christians as 'serial polygamy'.[citation needed] In contrast, sociologists and anthropologists refer to this as 'serial monogamy', since it is a series of monogamous (i.e. not polygamous) relationships.[41] The first term highlights the multiplicity of marriages throughout the life-cycle, the second the non-simultaneous nature of these marriages.

In Sub-Saharan Africa, there has often been a tension between the Christian churches' insistence on monogamy and traditional polygamy. In some instances in recent times there have been moves for accommodation; in others churches have resisted such moves strongly. African Independent Churches have sometimes referred to those parts of the Old Testament which describe polygamy in defending the practice.

 Mormonism

Main article: Polygamy and the Latter Day Saint movement
See also: Polygamy in the United States and List of Latter Day Saint practitioners of plural marriage

The history of Mormon polygamy begins with claims that Mormonism founder Joseph Smith received a revelation from God on July 17, 1831 that some Mormon men would be allowed to practice "plural marriage". This was later set down in the Doctrine and Covenants by the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church).[42] Despite Smith's revelation, the 1835 edition of the 101st Section of the Doctrine and Covenants, written before the doctrine of plural marriage began to be practiced, publicly condemned polygamy. This scripture was used by John Taylor in 1850 to quash Mormon polygamy rumors in Liverpool, England.[43] Polygamy was illegal in the state of Illinois[44] during the 1839-44 Nauvoo era when several top Mormon leaders including Smith, Brigham Young and Heber C. Kimball took plural wives. Mormon elders who publicly taught that all men were commanded to enter plural marriage were subject to harsh discipline.[45] On June 7, 1844 the Nauvoo Expositor criticized Smith for plural marriage. The Nauvoo city council declared the Nauvoo Expositor press a nuisance and ordered Smith, as Nauvoo's mayor, to order the city marshall to destroy the paper and its press. This controversial decision led to Smith going to Carthage Jail where he was killed by a mob on June 27, 1844. The main body of Mormons left Nauvoo and followed Brigham Young to Utah where the practice of plural marriage continued.

In 1852 Apostle Orson Pratt publicly acknowledged the practice of plural marriage through a sermon he gave. Additional sermons by top Mormon leaders on the virtues of polygamy followed.[46] Controversy followed when writers began to publish works condemning polygamy. The key plank of the Republican Party's 1856 platform was "to prohibit in the territories those twin relics of barbarism, polygamy and slavery".[47] In 1862, Congress issued the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act which clarified that the practice of polygamy was illegal in all U.S. territories. The LDS Church believed that their religiously-based practice of plural marriage was protected by the United States Constitution,[48] however, the unanimous 1878 Supreme Court decision Reynolds v. United States declared that polygamy was not protected by the Constitution, based on the longstanding legal principle that "laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinions, they may with practices."[49]

Increasingly harsh anti-polygamy legislation in the U.S. led some Mormons to emigrate to Canada and Mexico. In 1890, LDS Church president Wilford Woodruff issued a public declaration (the Manifesto) announcing the official discontinuance of polygamy. Anti-Mormon sentiment waned, as did opposition to statehood for Utah. The Smoot Hearings in 1904 spurred the LDS Church to issue a Second Manifesto against polygamy. By 1910 the LDS Church excommunicated those who practiced polygamy. Even so, many plural husbands and wives continued to cohabit until their deaths in the 1940s and 1950s.[50]

Enforcement of the 1890 Manifesto caused various splinter groups to leave the LDS Church in order to continue the practice of plural marriage.[51] Polygamy among these groups persists today in Utah and neighboring states as well as in the spin-off colonies. Polygamist churches of Mormon origin are often referred to as "Mormon fundamentalist" even though they are not a part of the mainstream LDS church. Such fundamentalists often use an 1886 revelation to John Taylor as the basis for their authority to continue the practice of plural marriage.[52] The Salt Lake Tribune stated in 2005 there were as many as 37,000 fundamentalists with less than half of them living in polygamous households.[53]

 Islam

Main article: Polygamy in Islam

In Islam, polygamy is allowed for men, with the specific limitation that they can only have up to four wives at any one time. The Qur'an also states that men who choose this route must deal with their wives as fairly as possible, doing everything that they can to spend equal amounts of time and money on each one of them. If the husband cannot deal with his wives fairly, one is enough. Women on the other hand,are only allowed the one Husband. Although many Muslim countries still retain traditional Islamic law which permits polygamy, certain elements within some Muslim societies challenge its acceptability. For example, polygamy is prohibited by law in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Tunisia and Turkey.

Polygamy, and laws concerning polygamy, differ greatly throughout the Islamic world and form a very complex and diverse background from nation to nation. Whereas in some Muslim countries it may be fairly common, in most others it is often rare or non-existent. However, there are certain core fundamentals which are found in most Muslim countries where the practice occurs. According to traditional Islamic law, a man may take up to four wives, and each of those wives must have her own property, assets, and dowry. Usually the wives have little to no contact with each other and lead separate, individual lives in their own houses, and sometimes in different cities, though they all share the same husband. Muhammad, who had a monogamous marriage with Khadija for twenty five years till her death, married many of his wives because they were war widows who were left with nothing and took care of them. Thus, polygamy is an exception rather than the rule and is traditionally restricted to men who can manage things, and in some countries it is illegal for a man to marry multiple wives if he is unable to afford to take care of each of them properly.

In the modern Islamic world, polygamy is mainly found in traditionalist Arab cultures[citation needed], Saudi Arabia, West and East Africa (In Sudan it is encouraged from the president)[54] and the United Arab Emirates for instance[citation needed], whereas in secular Arab states like Tunisia and non-Arab countries with Muslim population, Turkey for example, it is banned. However, polygamy is still practiced in Malaysia, a non-Arab Muslim country, but there are restrictions as to how it can be practiced.[55] In traditionalist cultures where polygamy is still commonplace and legal, Muslim polygamists do not separate themselves from the society at large, since there would be no need as each spouse leads a separate life from the others.

 Legal situation

See also: Polygamy in the United States

Most western countries do not recognize polygamous marriages, and consider bigamy a crime. Several countries also prohibit people from living a polygamous lifestyle.

In some States of the United States, the criminalization of a polygamous lifestyle originated as anti-Mormon laws, although they are rarely enforced.[56]

Polygamists may find it harder dealing with government agencies, such as obtaining legal immigrant status.

 By country

  • Canada: Illegal according to the Criminal Code of Canada, Section 293.[57]
  • Libya: Polygyny is legal up to four wives, but requires a written consent from the first wife.
  • Tunisia: Illegal.
  • Turkey: Illegal.
  • United Kingdom: Illegal if the marriage took place in the UK, but recognized if it took place in another country where legislations allow it.[58]
  • United States: Illegal in all 50 states.

 Current proponents and opponents

 Secular

David Friedman and Steve Sailer have argued that polygamy tends to benefit most women and disadvantage most men, under the assumption that most men and women do not practise it. The idea is firstly that many women would prefer half or one third of someone especially appealing to being the single spouse of someone that doesn't provide as much economic utility to them. Secondly, that the remaining women have a better market for finding a spouse themselves. Say that 20% of women are married to 10% of men, that leaves 90% of men to compete over the remaining 80% of women. Friedman uses this viewpoint to argue in favor of legalizing polygamy, while Sailer uses it to argue against legalizing it.

In the US, the Libertarian Party supports complete decriminalization of polygamy as part of a general belief that the government should not regulate marriages.

Individualist feminism and advocates such as Wendy McElroy also support the freedom for adults to voluntarily enter polygamous marriages.

In Uruguay the "Colorado Party" supports polygamy.[citation needed]

The American Civil Liberties Union of Utah, USA, is opposed to Utah's law against bigamy.[59]

Those who advocate a Federal Marriage Amendment to the American Constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage generally word their proposed laws to also prohibit polygamy. Many proponents of same-sex marriage are also in favour of maintaining current statutory prohibitions against polygamy, arguing that while same-sex marriages do not involve toleration of pedophilia amongst practitioners, the same is not true of most polygamists in the United States..[citation needed]

Stanley Kurtz, a fellow at the Hudson Institute, lamented the modern arguments increasingly being made by various intellectuals who call for de-criminalizing polygamy. Kurtz concluded, "Marriage, as its ultramodern critics would like to say, is indeed about choosing one's partner, and about freedom in a society that values freedom. But that's not the only thing it is about. As the Supreme Court justices who unanimously decided Reynolds in 1878 understood, marriage is also about sustaining the conditions in which freedom can thrive. Polygamy in all its forms is a recipe for social structures that inhibit and ultimately undermine social freedom and democracy. A hard-won lesson of Western history is that genuine democratic self-rule begins at the hearth of the monogamous family."[60]

 Religious

The Roman Catholic Church clearly condemns polygamy; the Catechism of the Catholic Church lists it in paragraph 2387 under the head "Other offenses against the dignity of marriage" and states that it "is not in accord with the moral law." Also in paragraph 1645 under the head "The Goods and Requirements of Conjugal Love" states "The unity of marriage, distinctly recognized by our Lord, is made clear in the equal personal dignity which must be accorded to man and wife in mutual and unreserved affection. Polygamy is contrary to conjugal love which is undivided and exclusive."

Currently the vast majority of Protestant congregations take the Catholic view on polygamy.[citation needed]

The illegality of polygamy in certain areas creates, according to certain Bible passages, additional arguments against it. Paul of Tarsus writes "submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also because of conscience" (Romans 13:5), for "the authorities that exist have been established by God." (Romans 13:1) St Peter concurs when he says to "submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every authority instituted among men: whether to the king, as the supreme authority, or to governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right." (1 Peter 2:13,14) Pro-polygamists argue that, as long as polygamists currently do not obtain legal marriage licenses for additional spouses, no enforced laws are being broken any more than when monogamous couples who similarly co-habitate without a marriage license.[61]

At the present time, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints supports enforcing laws against polygamy, although historically this denomination practiced polygamy which they considered to be a principle revealed by God, and fought vocally against those seeking to establish such laws. Today, the church will excommunicate any member found to be practicing polygamy.

Controversial Christian vegetarian activist and leader Nathan Braun implies a positive stance towards polygamy in his fourth edition of The History and Philosophy of Marriage.

 Polygamy in fiction and popular culture

The quip "Bigamy is having one spouse too many. Monogamy is the same." is popularly misattributed to Oscar Wilde.

A popular joke with Mark Twain has Twain asked to cite a Scripture reference that forbids polygamy, and he responds with, "No man can serve two masters."

 Science fiction, utopias, dystopias

A number of writers have expressed their views on polygamy by writing about a fictional world in which it is the most common type of relationship. These worlds tend to be utopian or dystopian in nature. For instance, Robert A. Heinlein uses this theme in a number of novels, such as Stranger in a Strange Land. Polygamy is practiced by the Fremen in Frank Herbert's Dune as a means to pinpoint male infertility. It is socially accepted as long as the man provides for all wives equally. Cultures described within the Dune novel series have intentional similarities to Islamic, Arabic, and other cultures – i.e. desert cultures. Similarly, the Aiel society in Robert Jordan's The Wheel of Time series practice a form of polygamy, in which multiple women may marry the same man; in that fictional culture, women are the ones who propose marriage. Among Aiel, sisters or very close friends who have adopted each other as sisters, will often marry the same man, so that he will not come between them. Ursula K. Le Guin describes a planet O, where the cultural norm is a "sedoretu" or four-person marriage (a set combination of both genders and sexual orientations). Dan Simmons describes a culture of three-person marriages (any gender ratio) in his book Endymion. In David Weber's Honor Harrington series, the inhabitants of the planet Grayson practice polygamy (polygyny) due to the human colonists to the planet acquiring a genetic defect that gave rise to a large women-to-men birth ratio combined with a high infant mortality. Wen Spencer's science fiction novel A Brother's Price describes a society where men are very rare and protected, and multiple sisters typically marry one man

In the Star Trek television series Enterprise, the ship's physician, Dr. Phlox (who is a Denobulan) has three wives, each of whom has three husbands of her own (including him). One of his wives seemed to be interested in having extramarital relations with a human, which Phlox himself did not oppose, and even encouraged. It has also been stated that the Andorian species enter into group marriages (although whether this is due to societal custom or biological necessity has not been firmly established.) In the Sci-Fi television series Babylon 5 the Centauris allow for men to have more than one wife. In Star Wars Expanded Universe, it is explained that Cereans (like Ki-Adi-Mundi) have a much higher birth-rate of girls than boys. Thus, every male Cerean must have one wife and multiple "honor wives", to increase the chance of giving birth to another male. Jedi Cerean Ki-Adi-Mundi was allowed to marry multiple times, although Jedis were not supposed to marry at his time; but Ki-Adi-Mundi got a dispense of that norm.

 Prehistoric and historic fiction

Jean M. Auel in the pre-historic Earth's Children series depicted several instances of "co-mating," where a person could have more than one mate. Examples included the headwoman Tulie in the Mammoth Hunters, and a man who married a pair of twins in the Shelters of Stone. Also of note was Vinavec, the headman of the Mammoth Camp who wished to mate with the protagonist Ayla and was willing to take her Promised, Ranec, implying a bisexual relationship as well.

In Duke of the Mount Deer/The Deer and the Cauldron the Hong Kong writer, Louis Cha (Jin Yung), assigned seven willing wives of different characters to the very capable hero Wai-Siu-Bo (Wei-Xiao-Bao). This politics, office-politics, romance, and kung-fu survival story was based in the early Ching (Qing) Dynasty (of Kangxi reign 1654–1722). The saga has been made into films and TV series several times since the 1960s. Famous actors like Tony Leung (Leung Chiu Wai), Steven Chow (Chow Sing Chi), and Dicky Cheung (Cheung-Wai-Kin) have played the male role.

 Contemporary settings

Noted libertarian author L. Neil Smith included a character married to two sisters in his book The American Zone. The dominant culture in the novel sees one's religion and personal living accommodations as no one else's business, and "acts of capitalism between consenting adults" as the norm instead of something immoral. A Home at the End of the World is a novel by Michael Cunningham about a polygamous family. It was later adapted into a film. Both explore issues of homosexuality and families. Big Love is an HBO series about a polygamous family in Utah in the first decade of the 21st century. In the series, Bill Henrickson has three wives and seven children, who belong to a fundamentalist Mormon splinter group. Big Love explores the complex legal, moral, and religious issues associated with polygamy in Utah. Henrickson's three wives each have separate houses beside one another, with a shared backyard. By outward appearances, he lives with his primary wife, and has two "friends" living close by, while in reality taking turns sleeping at a different house each night. Henrickson effectively balances his work, the continuing demands of his wives, and his wives' relatives. Random House published David Ebershoff's novel The 19th Wife in 2008. It is about Ann Eliza Young, one of Brigham Young's wives, and the legacy of Mormon polygamy in the United States today.

 See also

  • Forms of nonmonogamy
  • Hypergamy
  • Pilegesh
  • Plaçage
  • Polyamory
  • Triad (relationship)
  • Marriage (conflict)#Polygamy
  • John Milton

 References

  1. ^ Polygamy at socialsciencedictionary.org
  2. ^ a b Ethnographic Atlas Codebook derived from George P. Murdock’s Ethnographic Atlas recording the marital composition of 1231 societies from 1960-1980
  3. ^ (Linda Stone, Kinship and Gender, 2006, Westview, 3rd ed, ch 6)The Center for Research on Tibet Papers on Tibetan Marriage and Polyandry. Accessed: October 1, 2006
  4. ^ Goldstein, Pahari and Tibetan Polyandry Revisited, Ethnology. 17(3): 325-327, 1978, from The Center for Research on Tibet. Accessed: October 1, 2007
  5. ^ Diouf, Nafi (May 2, 2004). "Polygamy hangs on in Africa", The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. 
  6. ^ Polygamy in Africa - Polygamy in Africa
  7. ^ South Africa Polygamy debate
  8. ^ Zuma charmed wives and nation The Australian
  9. ^ Zuma to wed on Saturday M&G
  10. ^ South Africa Polygamist Christians
  11. ^ Omar Hassan al-Bashir has urged Sudanese men to take more than one wife to increase the population
  12. ^ The Legacy Lingers On: Korean Confucianism and the Erosion of Women’s Rights by Hildi Kang, Research Fellow, Center for Korean Studies, University of California, Berkeley]
  13. ^ ?? — article in Chinese
  14. ^ Interpersonal Heterosexual Behaviors of Thai People, Extramarital Sex
  15. ^ The rights of husband and wife, Family Law in Thailand
  16. ^ A research on Thai view of sexuality and sexual behavior funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and conducted jointly by the Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University and Mahidol University, Bangkok, the Population Studies Center, University of Michigan and the Department of Sociology, University of Washington
  17. ^ Hong Kong, article by Man-Lun Ng, M.D.; part of "The International Encyclopedia of Sexuality" Volume I – IV 1997–2001, Edited by Robert T. Francoeur
  18. ^ Graeme Lang, Josephine Smart (2002). "Migration and the “second wife” in South China: Toward cross-border polygamy". The International Migration Review 36 (5): 546–569. 
  19. ^ Hong Kong Targets Its Two-Family Men, Kevin Murphy, International Herald Tribune, Tuesday, February 7, 1995
  20. ^ Marriages-Divorces section at general information website on Indian laws by Sudhir Shah & Associates
  21. ^ And Sarai Abram's wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.Genesis 16:3
  22. ^ Leah, Rachel, Bilhah and Zilpah
  23. ^ 1Kings 11:3: He had seven hundred wives of royal birth and three hundred concubines, and his wives led him astray.
  24. ^ [1]
  25. ^ [2]
  26. ^ Deuteronomy 21:15-17
  27. ^ Judaica Press Complete Tanach, Devarim - Chapter 17 from Chabad.org
  28. ^ Women, similar to wives
  29. ^ "The Jewish Family: Metaphor and Memory", David Charles Kraemer, p21, Oxford University Press US, 1989, ISBN 0195054679
  30. ^ Judaism and Polygamy: "Originally, Gershom's ban was limited in time to the year 1260," and a man "could marry more than one wife if he obtained the special permission of 100 rabbis in 3 countries."
  31. ^ The law requires to obtain permission of the chief rabbis.
  32. ^ Letter to Philip of Hesse, December 10, 1539, De Wette-Seidemann, 6:238-244
  33. ^ The Life of Luther Written by Himself, p.251 [3]
  34. ^ James Bowling Mozley Essays, Historical and Theological. 1:403-404 Excerpts from Der Beichtrat.[4]
  35. ^ Letter to the Chancellor Gregor Brück,[5] January 13, 1524, De Wette 2:459.
  36. ^ Larry O. Jensen, A Genealogical Handbook of German Research (Rev. Ed., 1980) p. 59.
  37. ^ Joseph Alfred X. Michiels, Secret History of the Austrian Government and of its Systematic Persecutions of Protestants (London: Chapman and Hall, 1859) p. 85 (copy at Google Books), the author stating that he is quoting from a copy of the legislation.
  38. ^ William Walker Rockwell, Die Doppelehe des Landgrafen Philipp von Hessen (Marburg, 1904), p. 280, n. 2 (copy at Google Books), which reports the number of wives allowed was two.
  39. ^ Leonhard Theobald, “Der angebliche Bigamiebeschluß des fränkischen Kreistages” [“The So-called Bigamy Decision of the Franconian Kreistag”], Beitrage zur Bayerischen kirchengeschichte [Contributions to Bavarian Church History] 23 (1916 – bound volume dated 1917) Erlangen: 199-200 (Theobald reporting that the Franconian Kreistag did not hold session between 1645 and 1664, and that there is no record of such a law in the extant archives of Nürnberg, Ansbach, or Bamberg, Theobald believing that the editors of the Fränkisches Archiv must have misunderstood a draft of some other legislation from 1650).
  40. ^ Alfred Altmann, "Verein für Geschichte der Stadt Nürnburg," Jahresbericht über das 43 Vereinsjahr 1920 [Annual Report for the 43rd Year 1920 of the Historical Society of the City of Nuremberg] (Nürnberg 1920): 13-15 (Altmann reporting a lecture he had given discussing the polygamy permission said to have been granted in Nuremberg in 1650, Altmann characterizing the Fränkisches Archiv as "merely a popular journal, not an edition of state documents," and describing the tradition as "a literary fantasy").
  41. ^ Fisher, Helen. The First Sex. Ballantine Books. pp. 271–72, 276. ISBN 0-449-91260-4. 
  42. ^ Doctrine and Covenants 132 as found at lds.org
  43. ^ THREE NIGHTS PUBLIC DISCUSSION Between The Revds. C. W. Cleeve, James Robertson, and Philip Cater, And Elder John Taylor, Of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, At Boulogne-Sur-Mer, France. Chairman, Rev. K. Groves, M.A., Assisted By Charles Townley, LL.D., and Mr. Luddy. pg 8-9
  44. ^ Greiner & Sherman, Revised Laws of Illinois, 1833, pg. 198-199
  45. ^ Times and Seasons, vol. 5, pg. 423, February 1, 1844
  46. ^ JD 11:128 Brigham Young - June 18, 1865 - "Since the founding of the Roman empire monogamy has prevailed more extensively than in times previous to that. The founders of that ancient empire were robbers and women stealers, and made laws favoring monogamy in consequence of the scarcity of women among them, and hence this monogamic system which now prevails throughout Christendom, and which had been so fruitful a source of prostitution and whoredom throughout all the Christian monogamic cities of the Old and New World, until rottenness and decay are at the root of their institutions both national and religious."
  47. ^ GOP Convention of 1856 in Philadelphia from the Independence Hall Association website
  48. ^ Free Exercise Clause - First Amendment
  49. ^ Reynolds v. United States at findlaw.com
  50. ^ Polygamy entry in the Utah Historical Encyclopedia, University of Utah, 1994.
  51. ^ "The Primer" - Helping Victims of Domestic Violence and Child Abuse in Polygamous Communities. A joint report from the offices of the Attorney Generals of Arizona and Utah. (2006)
  52. ^ "An 1886 Revelation to John Taylor"
  53. ^ "LDS splinter groups growing" by Brooke Adams, August 9, 2005 - SLT Article ID: 10BF07C805DE5990
  54. ^ Omar Hassan al-Bashir, has urged Sudanese men to take more than one wife to increase the population
  55. ^ Women's Aid Organisation: Know Your Rights, Polygamy
  56. ^ Turley, Jonathan. Polygamy laws expose our own hypocrisy
  57. ^ "CBC News in Depth: Polygamy". CBC.ca (2008-04-25). Retrieved on 2009-01-11.
  58. ^ 1,000 men living legally with multiple wives despite fears over exploitation Times online
  59. ^ ACLU of Utah to Join Polygamists in Bigamy Fight, 7/16/1999 press release.
  60. ^ "Polygamy vs. Democracy" The Weekly Standard, June 5, 2006
  61. ^ "Law of the Land" page at BiblicalPolygamy.com

 Bibliography

  • Cairncross, John (1974). After Polygamy Was Made a Sin: The Social History of Christian Polygamy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN 0-7100-7730-0. 
  • Campbell, James (1869). "The History and Philosophy of Marriage". Re-published online at TruthBearer.org. First published in Boston. Retrieved on August 5, 2005.
  • Chapman, Samuel A. (2001). Polygamy, Bigamy and Human Rights Law. Xlibris Corp. ISBN 1-4010-1244-2. 
  • Hillman, Eugene. Polygamy Reconsidered: African Plural Marriage and the Christian Churches. New York: Orbis Books. ISBN 0-88344-391-0. 
  • Korotayev, Andrey (2004). World Religions and Social Evolution of the Old World Oikumene Civilizations: A Cross-cultural Perspective (First Edition ed.). Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press. ISBN 0-7734-6310-0. 
  • Van Wagoner, Richard S. (1992). Mormon Polygamy: A History (2nd Ed. ed.). Utah: Signature Books. ISBN 0-941214-79-6. 
  • Wilson, E. O. (2000). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard Univ Pr. ISBN 0-674-00235-0. 

 External links

Sister project Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Polygamy
Sister project Look up polygamy in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
The external links in this article may not follow Wikipedia's content policies or guidelines.
Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links.
  • The Four Major Periods of Mormon Polygamy
  • Spiritual roots of Mormon polygamy
  • History of Polygamy in Judaism
  • History of Jewish Marriage
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamy"
Categories: Mating systems | Greek loanwords | Polygamy | Religion and politics | Plural marriage
Hidden categories: Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases | All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements since February 2007 | Articles to be expanded since April 2008 | All articles to be expanded | Articles with unsourced statements since April 2007 | Articles with unsourced statements since September 2007 | Articles with unsourced statements since November 2007 | Articles with limited geographic scope | Articles with unsourced statements since December 2008 | Articles with unsourced statements since June 2008 | Wikipedia external links cleanup

 

GERMANIA - ZEGG

 

Zegg (Zentrum fuer experimentelle GesellschaftsGestaltung), Rosa Luxemburg Str. 89 - D 14806 BELZIG - Deutschland ()
Tel. 033841-59510
www.Zegg.de
empfang@Zegg.de
         
Da circa un decennio un’ottantina di persone a Belzig, 80 km da Berlino, stanno dando luogo a uno straordinario esperimento sociale. L’obiettivo che le anima è la realizzazione della pace (personale e interpersonale) e un modo di vita che non sia basato sullo sfruttamento di altre parti del mondo.
Un laboratorio di sperimentazione sociale

Ecologia, amore, sessualità, ricerca spirituale, vita coi bambini, e il loro distillato sul piano dell’impegno politico, costituiscono il cuore della vita e della ricerca che si svolgono a Zegg. Esperienze e riflessioni vengono diffuse tramite corsi e seminari e sviluppate insieme agli ospiti che transitano nella comunità.

L’economia

Lo Zegg si finanzia essenzialmente con le entrate derivanti dal lavoro congressuale e dagli affitti pagati da famiglie e imprese residenti. Imprese e persone appartenenti alla comunità sono responsabili delle loro entrate. Accanto a ciò c’è un grosso settore di economia comunitaria che si esprime nel lavoro comune all’interno della Zegg GmbH (società a responsabilità limitata di cui sono soci i residenti). La Zegg GmbH è proprietaria del terreno e titolare dell’attività congressuale e seminariale. Alcuni residenti sono dipendenti della Società, mentre altri lavorano come liberi professionisti o con imprese proprie dentro e fuori Zegg.
Alla base del progetto Zegg c’è un’intuizione, una visione, quella della persona inserita in una solida rete di legami sociali. Una rete che costituisce quel cespite prezioso che permette alla persona di sentirsi confermata nella sua identità e che la mette in condizione di esprimere e mettere a disposizione degli altri il proprio talento.

Essere trasparenti

Una comunità è formata da una molteplicità di persone che si completano e si sostengono nella loro crescita, che vuol dire espressione del proprio essere e assunzione di responsabilità. La trasparenza dell’essere umano, verso se stesso e verso gli altri, costituisce il nocciolo del lavoro svolto a Zegg sulla persona. Attraverso il ripetersi di rituali comunitari come il Forum e la partecipazione a corsi, si apprende a conoscere se stessi e a comunicare in modo più consapevole, distinguendo il contenuto cognitivo dei messaggi dalle loro implicazioni emotive.
La comunità si riunisce a intervalli regolari in molti modi, di domenica mattina per colloqui spirituali, nel Plenum per informazioni e per prendere decisioni, in occasione delle feste di stagione, eventi musicali, azioni teatrali, danza, sauna, dialoghi filosofici o lavoro comune. Una forma importante di lavoro comunitario è rappresentata dal Forum, forma comunicativa ritualizzata e artistica. Il Forum offre un palcoscenico sul quale vengono resi visibili pensieri, sentimenti e moventi della persona. Promuove la trasparenza nell’ambito dell’amore, del potere e delle strutture decisionali e aiuta a distinguere la discussione oggettiva dai fatti emotivi, qualificandosi come un contributo fondamentale alla conoscenza di sé e alla costruzione della fiducia tra le persone.

Vivere l’ecologia

A Zegg l’ecologia viene interpretata come intreccio tra la vita umana e il corso universale della natura. Con coerenza, viene perseguita una relazione partecipativa con gli elementi, la terra che ci circonda e i suoi abitanti, gli animali e le piante. La natura non è una cosa che si trova lì per essere usata o sfruttata, ma è animata e proviene dalla stessa nostra sorgente.
Il lavoro ecologico nella comunità è imperniato attorno ai principi della permacoltura. Permacoltura significa agricoltura durevole e designa la coltivazione di prodotti alimentari e l’uso di materiali da costruzione secondo principi di sostenibilità. L’acqua utilizzata proviene dal pozzo comunitario e l’acqua di scolo viene purificata dal 1992 con un impianto di filtraggio vegetale. La comunità sorge su un terreno prevalentemente sabbioso, che contiene poche sostanze nutritive e non trattiene l’acqua. A ciò si supplisce con la produzione di humus tramite materiale organico e favorendo un’adeguata copertura vegetale.
Lo Zegg è riscaldato dal 1992 con trucioli di legno, una materia prima che sta aumentando d’importanza in ambito regionale e che garantisce un rifornimento d’energia neutro dal punto di vista della CO2. Dal 2003 è in progetto l’installazione di un impianto di riscaldamento centralizzato a legna. Alcune delle automobili circolanti nella comunità funzionano a olio vegetale.
Il territorio che circonda Zegg è coperto da ampie estensioni di bosco di pino silvestre che, nello spazio appartenente alla comunità, viene trasformato in bosco misto naturale. Intorno alle case viene data vita a una tipologia paesaggistica di orto e parco, che permette a residenti e ospiti di essere riforniti di frutta e verdura, soprattutto in estate.
In edilizia, accanto alle metodologie convenzionali c’è un uso crescente di tipologie ecologiche sia negli interni che all’esterno.
Un capitolo interessante del progetto Zegg, anche se a lunga scadenza, è quello dell’integrazione regionale nel quadro di un’economia sostenibile. A tal fine viene impostata una collaborazione con persone e progetti della zona, in modo da strutturare un flusso economico e di materie prime su base regionale. Si lavora a programmi studiati per le regioni limitrofe al fine di promuovere l’approvvigionamento di beni e l’erogazione di servizi vitali dalle immediate vicinanze e diminuire sempre più la dipendenza dai canali distributivi industriali. Di questo progetto fanno parte la produzione di generi alimentari e di energia da biomassa (legno, semi oleosi, biogas, ecc.), l’uso di materiali da costruzione locali e il riciclaggio.

Cosa bolle in pentola

In cucina si mangia vegetariano, a volte vegan, anche se questo non significa che tutti gli abitanti di Zegg siano vegetariani. I prodotti provengono in gran parte da produzioni biologiche locali o del commercio equo. Alimentarsi è compiere una scelta politica che tenga conto delle condizioni produttive ecologiche e sociali dei generi di prima necessità e di quelli voluttuari.

Amore e sessualità

L’amore e la sessualità rivestono a Zegg un ruolo importante. Un concetto impiegato spesso è quello di “amore libero”, che però viene utilizzato con prudenza, dati i malintesi che genera. Con quest’espressione a Zegg intendono un amore che si esprima libero da paure per tutti i partecipanti. La cultura moderna la strutturato delle forme d’amore piuttosto rigide come il feeling-di-una-notte e il legame fisso, spesso destinato al naufragio. La rigidità di queste modalità relazionali salta all’occhio quando vengono messe a confronto con la piena multiforme dei desideri individuali ai quali non forniscono una risposta. Per questo si rendono necessarie alternative che coniughino il desiderio di stabilità e l’anelito al legame col piacere della scoperta e dell’avventura. A Zegg l’amore è un fatto politico, vale a dire che accanto a riflessioni personali e intime è sottoposto anche a considerazioni di carattere generale. Da qui la domanda di quali circostanze sociali, di quali modi di vivere abbiamo bisogno per poter vivere i diversi e spesso contraddittori aspetti dell’amore nella loro verità più profonda.


 
Di cosa ci occupiamo Chi è lo psicoterapeuta   Come si svolge la psicoterapia Come procediamo Organizzazione clinica

tariffario ordinario

tariffario agevolato

CONVENZIONI DIRETTE

LA PSICOTERAPIA

 

Psicologo - Psicoterapeuta - Psichiatra - Neurologo

 

Cause dei disturbi

Diagnosi dei disturbi

Terapia dei disturbi

Disturbi d'Ansia e Panico

Depressione

Anoressia e Bulimia

Disturbi di Personalità

Disturbi del sonno

Disturbi sessuali

Disturbi Psicosomatici

Disturbi da Dipendenze

Terapia di Coppia

Consulenza Psicologica

Cultura e Società

Psicologia Medica

 

Scrivi allo Psicoterapeuta - Scrivi al Sessuologo - Scrivi all' Andrologo - Scrivi allo Psichiatra - Scrivi al Neurologo - Scrivi al Medico

 [ La nostra procedura di diagnosi e cura ] [ Il tariffario convenzionato con parcelle ridotte ]

*

La nostra segreteria

091.6820331  -  331.2058233

 

 

 

 

-Dott. Sergio Angileri - aut. san. N.2573/95 , 7/8/95 - Ordine Psicologi Sicilia N°480-
  © 2000 [Psicoterapia e Medicina Psicosomatica] 90145 Palermo - via L.da Vinci, 111 - tel. 0916820331 - mob. 331.2058233 - fax. 0916832636 - E-mail